linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	lczerner@redhat.com, Ashish Sangwan <ashish.sangwan2@gmail.com>,
	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ext4: fix hole punch failure when depth is greater than 0
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:34:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120723003440.GG9958@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1341937570-5229-1-git-send-email-ashish.sangwan2@gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:56:10PM +0530, Ashish Sangwan wrote:
> Whether to continue removing extents or not is decided by the return value
> of function ext4_ext_more_to_rm() which checks 2 conditions:
> a) if there are no more indexes to process.
> b) if the number of entries are decreased in the header of "depth -1".
> 
> In case of hole punch, if the last block to be removed is not part of the
> last extent index than this index will not be deleted, hence the number of
> valid entries in the extent header of "depth - 1" will remain as it is and
> ext4_ext_more_to_rm will return 0 although the required blocks are not
> yet removed.
> 
> This patch fixes the above mentioned problem as instead of removing the
> extents from the end of file, it starts removing the blocks from the
> particular extent from which removing blocks is actually required and
> continue backward until done.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <ashish.sangwan2@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>

Applied, with a cc: to stable@kernel.org since it is a bug fix.

Thanks for submitting this patch!

	      	       			       	  - Ted

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-07-23  0:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-10 16:26 [PATCH v3] ext4: fix hole punch failure when depth is greater than 0 Ashish Sangwan
2012-07-13  8:08 ` Ashish Sangwan
2012-07-23  0:34 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-10  0:43 Ashish Sangwan
2012-07-10  4:35 ` Ashish Sangwan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120723003440.GG9958@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=ashish.sangwan2@gmail.com \
    --cc=ashishsangwan2@gmail.com \
    --cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linkinjeon@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).