From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Exciting :-( adventures in metadata checksumming
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 19:25:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120806232512.GE30677@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120806225937.17241.qmail@science.horizon.com>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 06:59:37PM -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
> debuild: fatal error at line 1350:
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -d -us -uc -b -ai386 failed
I don't think -ai386 will work for e2fsprogs since we need external
libraries; specifically, libblkid-dev and libuuid-dev and the dev
packages aren't multiarch compatible. (In fact, I'm not sure -ai386
to build 32-bit packages in an x86 environment will work in general.
It's certainly not the standard way 32-bit packages are built.)
The failures you're seeing is because "pkg-config --libs blkid" is
returning a null string when run in the dpkg-buildpackage -ai386
environment --- which is not surprising, since we don't have a -32/-64
bit link libraries in libblkid-dev.
So if you want to build a 32-bit set of packages of e2fsprogs, you'll
need to make a 32-bit build environment as a chroot, using debootstrap
and build e2fsprogs in the 32-bit chroot.
That's actually how I build my packages for Debian, BTW --- I have a
32-bit chroot, and I build the binary packages for i386 and upload
them from there. I let the autobuilders build the 64-bit binary
packages from the source upload. That way, the most commonly used
binary packages are built in a standard autobuilder environment, and
are not subject to the vagracies of my build environment. It also
means that I don't have to worry about the build scripts bitrot for
the 32-bit packages. (I also build 64-bit debs for my own use --- but
I don't upload them.)
Regards,
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-06 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-03 19:55 Exciting :-( adventures in metadata checksumming George Spelvin
2012-08-03 23:49 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-04 1:42 ` George Spelvin
2012-08-04 22:12 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-04 22:41 ` George Spelvin
2012-08-06 16:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-06 18:14 ` George Spelvin
2012-08-06 22:12 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-06 22:59 ` George Spelvin
2012-08-06 23:25 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2012-08-08 13:39 ` metadata_csum Oops George Spelvin
2012-08-08 22:34 ` Exciting :-( adventures in metadata checksumming George Spelvin
2012-08-08 23:42 ` George Spelvin
2012-08-09 5:00 ` George Spelvin
2012-08-09 23:48 ` Arrgh! Even more excitement with " George Spelvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120806232512.GE30677@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).