From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jbd2: don't write superblock when unmounting an ro filesystem
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:14:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120815121403.GA29223@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <500F1C28.8010800@redhat.com>
On Tue 24-07-12 17:05:28, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> This sequence:
>
> # truncate --size=65536 fsfile
> # losetup --offset 65536 /dev/loop0 fsfile
> # mkfs.ext4 /dev/loop0
> # losetup -d /dev/loop0
> # mount -o loop,ro,offset=65536 fsfile mnt/
> # umount mnt
> # dmesg | tail
>
> results in an IO error when unmounting the RO filesystem:
>
> [ 312.386074] SELinux: initialized (dev loop1, type ext4), uses xattr
> [ 318.020828] Buffer I/O error on device loop1, logical block 196608
> [ 318.027024] lost page write due to I/O error on loop1
> [ 318.032088] JBD2: Error -5 detected when updating journal superblock for loop1-8.
Ted, did this patch fall through cracks? I've ported the fix to JBD and
added it to my tree. I plan to send it to Linus in a few days. Also I've
CC'd stable since this is a bit annoying regression.
Honza
> This behavior changed with:
>
> commit 24bcc89c7e7c64982e6192b4952a0a92379fc341
> Author: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Date: Tue Mar 13 15:41:04 2012 -0400
>
> jbd2: split updating of journal superblock and marking journal empty
>
> which lost some of the magic in jbd2_journal_update_superblock() which
> used to test for a journal with no outstanding transactions.
>
> I'm not sure if the following is quite the right approach, but it fixes
> it for me.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> p.s. no idea why this only happens if I use a loop device with an offset!
>
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> index e9a3c4c..987ec76 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> @@ -1354,6 +1354,11 @@ static void jbd2_mark_journal_empty(journal_t *journal)
>
> BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex));
> read_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
> + /* Is it already empty? */
> + if (sb->s_start == 0) {
> + read_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
> + return;
> + }
> jbd_debug(1, "JBD2: Marking journal as empty (seq %d)\n",
> journal->j_tail_sequence);
>
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-15 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-24 22:05 [PATCH] jbd2: don't write superblock when unmounting an ro filesystem Eric Sandeen
2012-07-24 22:18 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-07-26 9:24 ` Lukáš Czerner
2012-07-30 15:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-08-15 12:14 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2012-08-15 17:25 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-08-18 18:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-19 18:54 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120815121403.GA29223@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).