linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
To: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "Lukáš Czerner" <lczerner@redhat.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
	"Milan Broz" <mbroz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: du -s src is a lot slower on SSD than spinning disk in the same laptop
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:50:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120816075004.GE8802@merlins.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120801053042.GG12695@merlins.org>

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:30:42PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> First: btrfs is the slowest:
> gandalfthegreat:/mnt/ssd/var/local# time du -sh src/
> 514M	src/
> real	0m25.741s
> 
> Second: ext4 with mkfs.ext4 -O extent -b 4096 /dev/sda3
> gandalfthegreat:/mnt/mnt3# reset_cache
> gandalfthegreat:/mnt/mnt3# time du -sh src/
> 519M	src/
> real	0m12.459s
> gandalfthegreat:~# grep mnt3 /proc/mounts
> /dev/sda3 /mnt/mnt3 ext4 rw,noatime,discard,data=ordered 0 0
> 
> A freshly made ntfs filesystem through fuse is actually FASTER!
> gandalfthegreat:/mnt/mnt2# reset_cache 
> gandalfthegreat:/mnt/mnt2# time du -sh src/
> 506M	src/
> real	0m8.928s
> gandalfthegreat:/mnt/mnt2# grep mnt2 /proc/mounts
> /dev/sda2 /mnt/mnt2 fuseblk rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime,user_id=0,group_id=0,allow_other,blksize=4096 0 0
> 
> How can ntfs via fuse be the fastest?

To provide closure to this thread.

I owed everyone an update, which I just finished typing:
http://marc.merlins.org/perso/linux/post_2012-08-15_The-tale-of-SSDs_-Crucial-C300-early-Death_-Samsung-830-extreme-random-IO-slowness_-and-settling-with-OCZ-Vertex-4.html

Basically, the samsung 830 just sucks. I got 2 of them, they both utterly
sucked. There is no excuse for an SSD being several times slower than a slow
hard drive on _READs_ (not even talking about writes).

I'm not sure how I could have gotten 2 bad drives from Samsung in 2
different shipments, so I'm afraid the entire line may be bad. At least, it
was for me after extensive benchmarking, and even using their own windows
benchmarking tool.

In the end, I got a OCZ Vertex 4 and it's superfast as per the benchmarks I
posted in the link above.

As good news, ext4 is faster than btrfs in my (limited) tests across both
SSDs and my hard drive.

Cheers,
Marc
-- 
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
                                      .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/  

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-08-16  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-25 15:45 du -s src is a lot slower on SSD than spinning disk in the same laptop Marc MERLIN
     [not found] ` <alpine.LFD.2.00.1207252023080.4340@(none)>
2012-07-25 23:38   ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-26  3:32   ` Ted Ts'o
2012-07-26  3:35     ` Marc MERLIN
2012-07-26  6:54     ` Marc MERLIN
2012-08-01  5:30       ` Marc MERLIN
2012-08-01  6:01         ` How can btrfs take 23sec to stat 23K files from an SSD? Marc MERLIN
2012-08-01  6:36           ` Chris Samuel
2012-08-01  6:40             ` Marc MERLIN
2012-08-01  8:18         ` du -s src is a lot slower on SSD than spinning disk in the same laptop Spelic
2012-08-16  7:50         ` Marc MERLIN [this message]
     [not found]           ` <502CC2A2.4010506@shiftmail.org>
2012-08-16 17:55             ` Marc MERLIN
2012-09-05 16:52               ` ext4 crash with 3.5.2 in ext4_ext_remove_space Marc MERLIN
2012-09-05 17:50                 ` Lukáš Czerner
2012-09-05 17:53                   ` Marc MERLIN
2012-09-06  4:24                   ` Marc MERLIN
2012-09-07 15:19                     ` Marc MERLIN
2012-09-07 15:39                       ` Lukáš Czerner
2012-09-07 15:51                         ` Marc MERLIN
     [not found] <201207222135.11159.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
     [not found] ` <20120202124241.GW16796@shiny>
     [not found]   ` <20120718220446.GB3888@merlins.org>
     [not found]     ` <20120722185848.GA10089@merlins.org>
     [not found]       ` <20120722204428.GC3925@merlins.org>
     [not found]         ` <20120722224145.GC12951@merlins.org>
     [not found]           ` <20120723064202.GB6931@merlins.org>
     [not found]             ` <20120727110835.GA6933@shiny>

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120816075004.GE8802@merlins.org \
    --to=marc@merlins.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbroz@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).