From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, ext4 hackers <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove_space on 3.5.1
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:34:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120817203438.GA573@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120817174841.GA4519@infradead.org>
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 01:48:41PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Can you submit this for xfstests?
>
This is actually something I wanted to ask you guys about. There are
a series of ext4-specific tests that I could potentially add, but I
wasn't sure how welcome they would be in xfstests. Assuming that
ext4-specific tests would be welcome, is there a number range for
these ext4-specific tests that I should use?
BTW, we have an extension to xfstests that we've been using inside
Google where Google-internal tests have a "g" prefix (i.e., g001,
g002, etc.). That way we didn't need to worry about conflicts between
newly added upstream xfstests, and ones which were added internally.
Would it make sense to start using some kind of prefix such as "e001"
for ext2/3/4 specific tests?
Regards,
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-17 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-15 18:33 NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove_space on 3.5.1 Marti Raudsepp
2012-08-16 2:46 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-16 11:10 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-16 15:25 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-16 20:21 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2012-08-16 21:19 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-16 21:40 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2012-08-16 22:26 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-16 22:44 ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2012-08-17 6:01 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-17 13:15 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 13:22 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-17 13:50 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix kernel BUG on large-scale rm -rf commands Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 17:48 ` NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove_space on 3.5.1 Christoph Hellwig
2012-08-17 20:34 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2012-08-17 21:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-08-17 22:55 ` Dave Chinner
2012-08-17 23:11 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 6:09 ` ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 Fengguang Wu
2012-08-17 13:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 14:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-17 14:25 ` ext4 write performance regression in 3.6-rc1 on RAID0/5 Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20120817151318.GA2341@localhost>
2012-08-17 15:37 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-08-17 20:44 ` NeilBrown
2012-08-21 9:42 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-08-21 12:07 ` Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20120822035702.GF2570@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
2012-08-22 4:07 ` Shaohua Li
2012-08-22 6:00 ` NeilBrown
2012-08-22 6:31 ` Yuanhan Liu
2012-08-22 7:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-08-22 20:47 ` Dan Williams
2012-08-22 21:59 ` NeilBrown
2012-09-17 12:21 ` NULL pointer dereference in ext4_ext_remove_space on 3.5.1 Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-17 13:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-17 14:48 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-08-16 9:00 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120817203438.GA573@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).