linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, dmonakhov@openvz.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Test 272 fails for ext3
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:49:41 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120820224941.GG19235@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120820210638.GA4591@quack.suse.cz>

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:06:38PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 20-08-12 18:22:12, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Fri 17-08-12 08:48:58, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:37:57AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > >   Hello,
> > > > 
> > > >   I was looking into why test 272 from xfstests fails for ext3 and the
> > > > reason is that ext3 does not support direct IO to file with enabled data
> > > > journalling (open returns EINVAL because ->direct_IO callback is not
> > > > specified). So I was thinking how to accomodate this fact in the test -
> > > > the best I found was to just check using xfs_io whether O_DIRECT open
> > > > succeeds and perform the test only in that case. Attached patch does this
> > > > or do people have other ideas?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > # ext3 doesn't support direct IO in journalling mode
> > > ext3_write_opt_list="iflag=noatime conv=notrunc conv=fsync"
> > > ext4_write_opt_list="iflag=noatime conv=notrunc conv=fsync oflag=direct"
> > > 
> > > if [ $FSTYP = "ext3" ]; then
> > > 	write_opt_list="$ext3_write_opt_list"
> > > else
> > > 	write_opt_list="$ext4_write_opt_list"
> > > fi
> >   Yeah, this is probably simpler. Thanks for suggestion. BTW, ext4 also
> > does not support direct IO and data journalling but it silently falls back
> > to buffered IO. Anyway new patch is attached.
>   Hum, after testing this I realized why I did the things the original way.
> The test writes a message with title for each test so when direct IO tests
> are skipped outputs don't match.
> 
> After some thought I decided to change the test to output titles only to
> full output and keep compared output (almost) empty. Result is attached.

....
> --- a/272
> +++ b/272
> @@ -32,15 +32,18 @@ tmp=/tmp/$$
>  status=1	# failure is the default!
>  trap "rm -f $tmp.*; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
>  
> +write_opt_list="iflag=noatime conv=notrunc conv=fsync oflag=direct"
> +if [ $FSTYP = "ext3" ]; then
> +	# ext3 doesn't support direct IO in journalling mode
> +	write_opt_list="iflag=noatime conv=notrunc conv=fsync"
> +fi

Seems like asking for trouble duplicating the common options.

# ext3 doesn't support direct IO in journalling mode
write_opt_list="iflag=noatime conv=notrunc conv=fsync
[ $FSTYP = "ext4" ] && write_opt_list="$write_opt_list oflag=direct"

Otherwise looks fine.

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-08-20 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-16  9:28 Test 272 fails for ext3 Jan Kara
2012-08-16  9:37 ` Jan Kara
2012-08-16 10:07   ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-08-16 22:48   ` Dave Chinner
2012-08-20 16:22     ` Jan Kara
2012-08-20 21:06       ` Jan Kara
2012-08-20 22:49         ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-08-21  8:03           ` Jan Kara
2012-09-18 21:26             ` Ben Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120820224941.GG19235@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).