From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, jack@suse.cz,
wenqing.lz@taobao.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] ext4: fsync should wait for DIO writers
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:51:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120910095135.GF22903@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347211634-11509-5-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org>
On Sun 09-09-12 21:27:11, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> fsync and punch_hole are the places where we have to wait for all
> existing writers (writeback, aio, dio), but currently we simply
> flush pended end_io request which is not sufficient.
Why not? I guess you mean the fact that there can be DIO in flight for
which end_io() was not called so it is not queued in the queue? But that is
OK - we have not yet called aio_complete() for that IO so for userspace the
write has not happened yet. Thus there's no need to flush it to disk -
fsync() does not say anything about writes in progress while fsync is
called.
> Even more i_mutex is not holded while punch_hole which obviously
> result in dangerous data corruption due to write-after-free.
Yes, that's a bug. I also noticed that but didn't get to fixing it (I'm
actually working on a more long term fix using range locking but that's
more of a research project so having somehow fixed at least the most
blatant locking problems is good).
Honza
>
> This patch performs following changes:
>
> - Guard punch_hole with i_mutex
> - fsync and punch_hole now wait for all writers in flight
> NOTE: XXX write-after-free race is still possible because
> truncate_pagecache_range() is not completely reliable and where
> is no easy way to stop writeback while punch_hole is in progress.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
> ---
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 10 ++++++++--
> fs/ext4/fsync.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> index e993879..8252651 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> @@ -4845,6 +4845,7 @@ int ext4_ext_punch_hole(struct file *file, loff_t offset, loff_t length)
> return err;
> }
>
> + mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> /* Now release the pages */
> if (last_page_offset > first_page_offset) {
> truncate_pagecache_range(inode, first_page_offset,
> @@ -4852,12 +4853,15 @@ int ext4_ext_punch_hole(struct file *file, loff_t offset, loff_t length)
> }
>
> /* finish any pending end_io work */
> + inode_dio_wait(inode);
> ext4_flush_completed_IO(inode);
>
> credits = ext4_writepage_trans_blocks(inode);
> handle = ext4_journal_start(inode, credits);
> - if (IS_ERR(handle))
> - return PTR_ERR(handle);
> + if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(handle);
> + goto out_mutex;
> + }
>
> err = ext4_orphan_add(handle, inode);
> if (err)
> @@ -4951,6 +4955,8 @@ out:
> inode->i_mtime = inode->i_ctime = ext4_current_time(inode);
> ext4_mark_inode_dirty(handle, inode);
> ext4_journal_stop(handle);
> +out_mutex:
> + mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> return err;
> }
> int ext4_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsync.c b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
> index 24f3719..290c5cf 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/fsync.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
> @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
> if (inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
> goto out;
>
> + inode_dio_wait(inode);
> ret = ext4_flush_completed_IO(inode);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out;
> --
> 1.7.7.6
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-10 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-09 17:27 [PATCH 0/7] ext4: Bunch of DIO/AIO fixes Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-09 17:27 ` [PATCH 1/7] ext4: ext4_inode_info diet Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-13 10:50 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-13 11:15 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-15 15:53 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-09 17:27 ` [PATCH 2/7] ext4: completed_io locking cleanup Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-10 9:23 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-10 10:19 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-13 10:48 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-09 17:27 ` [PATCH 3/7] ext4: serialize dio nolocked reads with defrag workers V2 Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-10 9:31 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-10 10:00 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-09 17:27 ` [PATCH 4/7] ext4: fsync should wait for DIO writers Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-10 9:51 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2012-09-10 10:56 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-12 14:02 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-12 5:40 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-13 10:46 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-13 11:01 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-13 12:36 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-09 17:27 ` [PATCH 5/7] ext4: serialize unlocked dio reads with truncate Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-10 9:54 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-09 17:27 ` [PATCH 6/7] ext4: endless truncate due to nonlocked dio readers V2 Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-13 10:41 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-13 12:07 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-13 12:57 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-13 14:34 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-13 23:31 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-09 17:27 ` [PATCH 7/7] ext4: serialize truncate with owerwrite DIO workers V2 Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-13 10:37 ` Zheng Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120910095135.GF22903@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).