From: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA?
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:03:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120918190345.GU3274@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120918184201.GD28689@thunk.org>
Hey Ted,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 02:42:01PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:28:41PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > Your impression is just a few days out of date. See:
> >
> > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2012-09/msg00156.html
>
> On a unrelated note, has there been any thought about potentially
> setting up a separate mailing list dedicated for xfstests?
You might even be the first person to suggest that. ;)
> I'm not
> subscribed to the xfs mailing list, mainly because I was trying to
> avoid adding yet another high volume mailing list to my inbox
> (although to be fair, I guess it's only 25 messages per day even on
> the busiest days), and so I've missed out on review of Dave's changes
> to break out the tests into hierarchies, etc. I wonder if there are
> other xfstests users that aren't yet subscribed to the xfs mailing
> list who would if there was a separate mailing list.
>
> Not a big deal; if people really don't want a separate mailing list, I
> guess I could subscribe to the xfs list as well...
I think it's worth discussing and I'm not resistant to a separate list. But
like you said, xfs@oss.sgi.com isn't extremely high volume. Maybe a filter for
xfstests in the subject would be good enough for your purposes?
Regards,
Ben
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-18 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-18 2:04 Anyone have test cases for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA? Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-18 2:29 ` Jie Liu
2012-09-18 6:21 ` Marco Stornelli
2012-09-18 6:40 ` Dave Chinner
2012-09-18 14:43 ` Mark Tinguely
2012-09-18 18:15 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-18 18:20 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-09-18 18:28 ` Ben Myers
2012-09-18 18:42 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-18 19:03 ` Ben Myers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120918190345.GU3274@sgi.com \
--to=bpm@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).