From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Yongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com>,
Allison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/8 v2] ext4: initialize extent status tree
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 12:45:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120924044504.GD6196@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120919190541.GE28470@thunk.org>
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 03:05:41PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 02:05:40PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > index 3e0851e..353b1fd 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> > @@ -944,6 +944,7 @@ static struct inode *ext4_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
> > memset(&ei->i_cached_extent, 0, sizeof(struct ext4_ext_cache));
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ei->i_prealloc_list);
> > spin_lock_init(&ei->i_prealloc_lock);
> > + ext4_es_init_tree(&ei->i_es_tree);
> > ei->i_reserved_data_blocks = 0;
> > ei->i_reserved_meta_blocks = 0;
> > ei->i_allocated_meta_blocks = 0;
>
> This patch hunk immediately me ask, "so when does the extent_status
> tree get freed?" And I believe the answer is that currently, since it
> only tracks delayed extents (and we're not using it for locking
> purposes), by the time we have evicted the inode and are ready to call
> ext4_clear_inode(), we should have released all of the nodes in the
> ext4_es_tree. Is that correct?
>
> If so, we might want to think about adding a sanity check to make sure
> that by the time we are done with the inode in ext4_evict_inode()
> (after we have forced writeback), the ext4_es_tree is empty. Agreed?
Yes, I agree with you. I will add a sanity check. :-)
Regards,
Zheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-24 4:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-22 6:05 [RFC][PATCH 0/8 v2] ext4: extent status tree (step 1) Zheng Liu
2012-08-22 6:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/8 v2] ext4: add two structures supporting extent status tree Zheng Liu
2012-08-22 6:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/8 v2] ext4: add operations on " Zheng Liu
2012-09-19 18:34 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-24 4:25 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-19 18:41 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-24 3:35 ` Zheng Liu
2012-08-22 6:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/8 v2] ext4: initialize " Zheng Liu
2012-09-19 18:53 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-19 19:05 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-24 4:45 ` Zheng Liu [this message]
2012-09-25 12:42 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-25 20:59 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-26 2:09 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-26 2:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-26 3:24 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-26 3:37 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-26 3:54 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-26 3:46 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-26 3:59 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-28 7:27 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-28 17:42 ` Theodore Ts'o
[not found] ` <CANWLp02F=qDXY_KbhAziPkBe8qGKV6oN3XtSdc5bWOkbDG684g@mail.gmail.com>
2012-09-29 3:07 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-29 13:26 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-30 14:00 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-29 13:24 ` Fwd: " Zheng Liu
2012-09-26 8:00 ` Zheng Liu
2012-08-22 6:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/8 v2] ext4: let ext4 maintain " Zheng Liu
2012-08-22 6:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/8 v2] ext4: add some tracepoints in " Zheng Liu
2012-08-22 6:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/8 v2] ext4: reimplement fiemap on " Zheng Liu
2012-08-22 6:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/8 v2] ext4: reimplement ext4_find_delay_alloc_range " Zheng Liu
2012-08-22 6:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/8 v2] ext4: introduce lseek SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE support Zheng Liu
2012-09-20 14:41 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/8 v2] ext4: extent status tree (step 1) Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-21 1:51 ` Zheng Liu
2012-09-21 3:19 ` Yongqiang Yang
2012-09-22 0:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-24 3:16 ` Zheng Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120924044504.GD6196@gmail.com \
--to=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
--cc=xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).