linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>,
	Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix potential deadlock in ext4_nonda_switch()
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:09:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120927180949.GA6862@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ipaziduh.fsf@openvz.org>

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 09:18:30PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> Hmm... even this '!' patch is still not good. I've got that complain
> WARNING: at fs/fs-writeback.c:1316 writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x1a3/0x200()

This WARN_ON checking to make sure the s_umount mutex is grabbed.

What kernel are you applying this patch against?  Commit 14da92001:
"fs: Protect write paths by sb_start_write - sb_end_write" adds a call
to sb_start_write() in generic_file_aio_write() which means by the
time we call ext4_nonda_switch(), s_umount is grabbed, which probably
explains why I'm not seeing this --- 14da92001 was added to mainline
as of 3.6-rc1, and I'm guessing you're using an older kernel?

This is something we need to consider, though, since "ext4: fix
potential deadlock in ext4_nonda_switch()" is currently marked for
stable, but commit 14da92001 is not marked for stable.  So if this
commit gets backported w/o 14da92001, stable kernel users will see
this warning.

						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-27 18:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-20  3:23 [PATCH] ext4: fix potential deadlock in ext4_nonda_switch() Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-21 22:12 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-09-21 23:59   ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-09-27 17:18     ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-27 18:09       ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2012-09-27 18:16         ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-09-27 20:14           ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120927180949.GA6862@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).