From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix ext4_flush_completed_IO wait semantics Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 16:24:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20121003202438.GA6026@thunk.org> References: <1349289807-18811-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <20121003185558.GB5160@thunk.org> <87lifns65w.fsf@openvz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz To: Dmitry Monakhov Return-path: Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:53646 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753468Ab2JCUYo (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2012 16:24:44 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lifns65w.fsf@openvz.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:32:27PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 14:55:58 -0400, "Theodore Ts'o" wrote: > > Are you planning on updating the 'ext4: completed_io locking cleanup > > V4' patch series, or is this an additional patch that should be tacked > > on to it? > This is addidional patch which should be placed on top of > 'ext4: completed_io locking cleanup V4' > I'll try to convince Jan Kara that this is the best way to fix both bugs. OK, thanks. I've been making the spelling/typo fixes suggested by Jan to the commits in my tree. So we're up to date on that front. I just wanted to know if there were any other changes you think were necessary to the patch series. I'll add the completed_io locking cleanup to my patch series, and start running tests.... - Ted