From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: ext4: fix metadata checksum calculation for the superblock Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:22:49 -0700 Message-ID: <20121101032249.GH19591@blackbox.djwong.org> References: <20121008024126.GC468@thunk.org> <20121101010521.893.qmail@science.horizon.com> <20121101011312.GG19591@blackbox.djwong.org> <20121101015015.GA28919@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: George Spelvin , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tm@tao.ma To: "Theodore Ts'o" Return-path: Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:19440 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757186Ab2KADW4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2012 23:22:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121101015015.GA28919@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 09:50:15PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 06:13:12PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > Author: Theodore Ts'o > > > Date: Sun Oct 7 22:18:56 2012 -0400 > > > Subject: ext4: fix metadata checksum calculation for the superblock > > This one was cc'ed to stable@vger.kernel.org. But when you said "I > notice, that neither of thse have made it into 2.6.5", I assume you > meant 3.5? The last 3.5 kernel is 3.5.7, and Greg K-H isn't > backporting fixes to 3.5.x any more. (See http://www.kernel.org to > see which kernels are marked "EOL"; those are the ones which are no > longer getting updates.) > > So that means it should eventually make it to the 3.4.x and 3.6.x > kernels. I thought he meant 3.6.5, but I haven't really been paying 3.6.x much attention. > > > Author: Darrick J. Wong > > > Date: Wed Oct 17 12:51:30 2012 -0700 > > > Subject: ext4: Don't verify checksums of dx non-leaf nodes during fallback linear scan > > I missed this one because the subject line didn't have [PATCH] in it. > (Darrick, it really helps if you use git format-patch / git > send-email; you can use a message-id of the message you're replying to > in the mail thread to chain the message to the thread.) > > I would have eventually found it in patchwork, but even in patchwork > the listing would have had a potentially misleading subject line, > since it grabs the patch title from the subject line of the e-mail. Oops, I guess I did forget the magic "[PATCH]". Sorry about that. > > I was wondering too, but I figured Ted was probably busy dealing with > > the corruption bug and such. > > > > (Which itself doesn't seem to be in 3.6.x yet) > > It isn't in 3.7-rc3 because I didn't see it before I sent the pull > request to Linus.... > > At this point I'll just include it in the patches to be sent to Linus > at the next merge window, mainly because I don't have the time to run > a separate regression test run just for this patch, and it's only a > cosmetic issue, right? Yep. --D > > - Ted > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html