From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tm@tao.ma, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: ext4: fix metadata checksum calculation for the superblock
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 17:05:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121102000558.GH19576@blackbox.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121101072847.25732.qmail@science.horizon.com>
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:28:47AM -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> > Oh, so ... it's just nfsd that causes the linear fallback? Regular (i.e.
> > non-nfs) users can see everything in the dir, no error messages?
>
> Yup. After it survived one e2fsck -D, I poked at the directory a bit
> to see if I could cause the error. No success from local access.
>
> It's also probably an NFSv2 client. I wonder if it's doing something
> odd with directory seeks that's causing problems; perhaps htree and the
> 32-bit seek cookie limit are not friends?
<shrug> I'm not nfs-wise, sadly. I _am_ wondering if an ftrace of this might
be useful... or a gigantic glut of data that I'll never finish processing.
Just from a quick read of ext4_find_entry() it looks like the only thing that
results in fallback mode without a kernel message is ext4_bread() failing in
dx_probe()?
> >> I haven't observed it, no. But the nature of the symptoms suggests it
> >> might be happening.
>
> > Hum. When linear scan happens on a hashed dir, it's scanning the same
> > blocks that the hash scan sees. The htree block looks like a regular
> > directory block with one huge "unused" dirent that wraps all the htree
> > data. So, the linear scan should find the exact same files as a htree
> > scan would. If it doesn't, something's wrong. But you say it isn't,
> > so I imagine it's fine.
>
> Maybe I was wrong. I was worried that it was aborting the directory
> scan due to the error and thus files would disappear. If that doesn't
> happen, no worries.
Oh well, it'll run slowly but at least it won't be throwing up errors.
--D
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-02 0:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-07 5:04 metadata_csum + unclean shutdown = failure to boot George Spelvin
2012-10-07 13:39 ` Tao Ma
2012-10-07 15:09 ` George Spelvin
2012-10-07 18:10 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-07 20:18 ` George Spelvin
2012-10-07 22:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-08 1:05 ` George Spelvin
2012-10-08 1:25 ` George Spelvin
2012-10-08 2:41 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-08 3:17 ` George Spelvin
2012-10-08 4:03 ` Tao Ma
2012-10-08 11:35 ` George Spelvin
2012-11-01 1:05 ` ext4: fix metadata checksum calculation for the superblock George Spelvin
2012-11-01 1:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2012-11-01 1:50 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-01 3:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2012-11-01 6:12 ` George Spelvin
2012-11-01 6:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2012-11-01 7:07 ` George Spelvin
2012-11-01 7:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2012-11-01 7:28 ` George Spelvin
2012-11-02 0:05 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121102000558.GH19576@blackbox.djwong.org \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=tm@tao.ma \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).