From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Mark Charlebois <charlebm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove VLAIS usage from JBD2 code
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 15:19:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121109231912.GA6444@blackbox.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121108155307.GB766@thunk.org>
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 10:53:07AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Hey Darrick,
>
> I was looking at this code a bit more closely while applying the
> revised version of this patch --- and this in particular raised a red
> flag for me:
>
> *(u32 *)desc.ctx = crc;
> ...
> return *(u32 *)desc.ctx;
>
> Does this raise any byte swapping issues? Looking at how the crc32
> code in crypto/ works, I'm almost certain this is broken on big-endian
> systems, and we need to add le32_to_cup() and cpu_to_le32() calls here.
>
> Am I missing something?
crc32_[bl]e_generic() in lib/crc32.c contains the appropriate be/le-to-cpu
conversion calls to ensure that the results are always returned in cpu-endian
format. The crypto/crc32.c file is basically just a crypto-hash wrapper around
the lib/crc32.c code, and don't touch the endianness at all. The ext4 code
receives the results from the crypto code in cpu-endian format and always
converts it to (or from) little-endian format when accessing disk structures.
As far as e2fsprogs, it leaves the checksums in le format, only converting it
to cpu-endian format when verifying or setting the checksum.
--D
>
> - Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-09 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-30 18:40 [PATCH] Removing the use of VLAIS from the Linux Kernel Behan Webster
2012-10-30 18:40 ` [PATCH] Remove VLAIS usage from JBD2 code Behan Webster
2012-10-30 19:00 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-10-30 19:02 ` Behan Webster
2012-10-30 19:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2012-11-08 15:53 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-09 23:19 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2012-11-09 23:24 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121109231912.GA6444@blackbox.djwong.org \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=behanw@converseincode.com \
--cc=charlebm@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).