From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsck: Fix incorrect interior node logical start values
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:31:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121129133129.GC20413@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A546D8.3020500@redhat.com>
Hmm, it looks like you didn't run the regression test script before
submitting this patch?
It looks like it's not a bug which your patch introduced, but rather,
it uncovered a bug. This was a failure in the second run of
f_extent_bad_node, because in the fix we didn't make sure we updated
the starting block of parent node when we cleared a node in the extent
tree. (see below)
This brings up another question. Did you test file systems after
running punch on a number of different files to make sure the e2fsck
is happy withe file systems which current kernels might generate?
In this particular test case, even though the logical start didn't
match, it doesn't cause any problems because it's at the left-most
branch of the tree. I want to make sure we aren't triggering failures
for file systems where the kernel is creating which is technically
incorrect, but which isn't causing problems in practice...
- Ted
% ./test_script f_extent_bad_node
f_extent_bad_node: bad interior node in extent tree: failed
--- ../../tests/f_extent_bad_node/expect.2 2012-07-06 13:37:27.316253023 +0000
+++ f_extent_bad_node.2.log 2012-11-29 13:24:11.119306973 +0000
@@ -1,7 +1,23 @@
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
+Interior extent node level 0 of inode 12:
+Logical start 0 does not match logical start 3 at next level. Fix? yes
+
+Inode 12, i_blocks is 8, should be 6. Fix? yes
+
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
-test_filesys: 12/16 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 25/100 blocks
-Exit status is 0
+Block bitmap differences: -24
+Fix? yes
+
+Free blocks count wrong for group #0 (75, counted=76).
+Fix? yes
+
+Free blocks count wrong (75, counted=76).
+Fix? yes
+
+
+test_filesys: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
+test_filesys: 12/16 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 24/100 blocks
+Exit status is 1
125 tests succeeded 1 tests failed
Tests failed: f_extent_bad_node
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-29 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-15 19:47 [PATCH] e2fsck: Fix incorrect interior node logical start values Eric Sandeen
2012-11-16 2:54 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-11-16 3:10 ` Eric Sandeen
[not found] ` <20121129044609.GC8029@thunk.org>
2012-11-29 4:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-29 5:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-11-29 13:22 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-29 13:31 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2012-11-29 15:22 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-11-29 16:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-29 16:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-11-29 18:56 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121129133129.GC20413@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).