From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsck: Fix incorrect interior node logical start values
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:40:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121129164029.GA16577@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50B77DB7.70307@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1205 bytes --]
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 09:22:31AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
> But it's a weird inconsistency isn't it, and fixing it up in fsck should
> be the right thing to do anyway?
Oh, I agree, but basically, as a result I'm going to put this patch on
hold until we do a bit more testing. I'm just not ready to push this
out on the maint branch just yet.....
(The general rule is that I want to keep the maint branch in a state
where someone who wants to take a snapshot for a production
environment should feel generally comfortable to do this --- modulo
rollout/integration testing, of course. I'll keep it on an
es/fsck-int-node-fixup branch to make sure we don't lose it, but it's
something where I want to add some additional testing before I'm
comfortable rolling it out to the maint branch, just to make sure it
doesn't trigger any regression.)
BTW, while I was experimenting with test cases I found another related
bug (but not a regression) where e2fsck isn't able to fix up a
specific fs corruption (see attached). It's unlikely to happen in
real life, but given how easily I was able to create something that
e2fsck can't fix, it's clear we were missing some synthetic test
cases.
- Ted
[-- Attachment #2: bad-extent-no-fix.img.gz --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 770 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-29 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-15 19:47 [PATCH] e2fsck: Fix incorrect interior node logical start values Eric Sandeen
2012-11-16 2:54 ` Andreas Dilger
2012-11-16 3:10 ` Eric Sandeen
[not found] ` <20121129044609.GC8029@thunk.org>
2012-11-29 4:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-29 5:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-11-29 13:22 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-29 13:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-29 15:22 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-11-29 16:40 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2012-11-29 16:43 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-11-29 18:56 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121129164029.GA16577@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).