From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>,
Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>,
Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.8.0-rc1: WARNING: at fs/ext4/page-io.c:232
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 11:21:31 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121229002131.GA3120@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121227134413.GA20671@thunk.org>
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 08:44:13AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:04:36PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> > In fact this is my fault that we still not have autotest for that.
> > I'm think of add crash-test to xfstests which should trigger journal
> > abort and forced umount. Later test should mount FS which trigger
> > journal_replay and orphan_cleanup.
>
> We could create some tests in xfstests which force a crash via "echo b
> > /proc/sysrq-trigger", but the trick is would require xfstests to
> install something in the /etc/rc scripts so xfstests could resume
> right after it came back --- and perhaps to echo something to the
> console which automated test runners (such as the one I use which I've
> published at [1] could capture so they would know that they should
> restart the system.
>
> [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/ext2/xfstests-bld.git
>
> For now the simplest way to test this is to use the file system image
> in tests/f_orphan_extents_inode/image.gz, and make this be an
> ext4-specific test. This is how I tested it when I created my fix (in
> parallel with Zheng's patch). The compressed file system image is
> only 564 bytes --- and was made deliberately w/o a journal so it could
> be that small --- and the lack of a journal was how I found the
> infinite loop problem which was fixed in the 2/2 patch in my patches.
> So including this compressed fs image in xfstests is probably the way
> I would suggest for now.
Just implement XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN. That way xfstests will immediately
support shutting down the filesystem via the src/godown utility.
The default XFS behaviour is to freeze the filesystem, then do a
forced shutdown on it, though it can also just trigger shutdowns
with and without first flushing the journal.
i.e. it sounds like test 121 is pretty much what you are describing
here...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-29 0:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-27 0:27 3.8.0-rc1: WARNING: at fs/ext4/page-io.c:232 Alexander Beregalov
2012-12-27 6:29 ` Zheng Liu
2012-12-27 8:04 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-12-27 10:33 ` Zheng Liu
2012-12-27 13:44 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-29 0:21 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2012-12-29 5:04 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2012-12-29 23:23 ` Dave Chinner
2013-01-02 15:17 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121229002131.GA3120@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=a.beregalov@gmail.com \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).