From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Jan kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7 v2] ext4: reclaim extents from extent status tree
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:09:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130121170937.GB15473@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130121150020.GA5618@thunk.org>
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:00:20AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 03:24:43PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> >
> > Do we need to CC' linux-fsdevel mailling list to let other folks review
> > this patch?
>
> For this patch, yes. And we'll need a commit description which
> explains why it's needed. Since I wrote the patch, I'm happy to
> supply the commit description. We can include it as a separate patch
> in your patch series, and I'll cc linux-fsdevel.
That would be great if you could give a commit description.
>
> As Jan mentioned, the only other user of it is Dave Chinner for the
> XFS code, and I had alreday checked to make sure that it shouldn't
> affect him --- but it would be good to cc him so he's in the loop.
As I metioned at another mail, I will cc him.
>
> Speaking of commit descriptions, I had made some other minor
> adjustments to some of the commits in your last version of the patch
> series, since I had already been assuming that I could take them until
> I saw the potential problems with the memory shrinker patch. So you
> can just provide a new version of the memory shrinker patch --- or if
> you have other changes you want to make to the earlier patches in that
> patch series, let me know and I can extract out the various comments
> and whitespace fixes that from the patches I have in my private tree,
> so we can merge them with any additional updates to your patches.
Your meaning is that you have made some changes in my patches of extent
status tree, aren't you? Now I have stashed es_status into es_pblk in
patch 3 (ext4: add physical block and status member into extent status
tree), and added a new patch that removes single extent cache. I am
happy to merge your changes if you could give them to me. Please let me
know if I could provide some helps.
Thanks,
- Zheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-21 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-11 10:53 [PATCH 0/7 v2] ext4: extent status tree (step2) Zheng Liu
2013-01-11 10:53 ` [PATCH 1/7 v2] ext4: refine extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-01-23 4:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-01-11 10:53 ` [PATCH 2/7 v2] ext4: remove EXT4_MAP_FROM_CLUSTER flag Zheng Liu
2013-01-11 10:53 ` [PATCH 3/7 v2] ext4: add physical block and status member into extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-01-17 4:42 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-01-18 9:49 ` Zheng Liu
2013-01-11 10:53 ` [PATCH 4/7 v2] ext4: adjust interfaces of " Zheng Liu
2013-01-11 10:53 ` [PATCH 5/7 v2] ext4: track all extent status in " Zheng Liu
2013-01-23 4:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-01-11 10:53 ` [PATCH 6/7 v2] ext4: lookup block mapping " Zheng Liu
2013-01-18 4:00 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-01-18 9:52 ` Zheng Liu
2013-01-11 10:53 ` [PATCH 7/7 v2] ext4: reclaim extents from " Zheng Liu
2013-01-18 5:19 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-01-18 5:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-01-21 7:24 ` Zheng Liu
2013-01-21 15:00 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-01-21 17:09 ` Zheng Liu [this message]
2013-01-23 6:06 ` [PATCH] fs: allow for fs-specific objects to be pruned as part of pruning inodes Theodore Ts'o
2013-01-23 10:52 ` Jan Kara
2013-01-23 13:06 ` Carlos Maiolino
2013-01-23 13:32 ` Dave Chinner
2013-01-23 16:34 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-01-23 23:35 ` Dave Chinner
2013-01-24 8:58 ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-24 20:03 ` Dave Chinner
2013-01-21 14:43 ` [PATCH 7/7 v2] ext4: reclaim extents from extent status tree Jan Kara
2013-01-21 15:12 ` Zheng Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130121170937.GB15473@gmail.com \
--to=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).