From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>,
Christopher Li <sparse@chrisli.org>,
linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10 v3] ext4: add physical block and status member into extent status tree
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:21:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130203052113.GA9823@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130203030343.GB1359@thunk.org>
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 10:03:43PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:43:33AM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> >
> > Clang is first coming in my mind. I know that some one try to use it
> > to build a linux kernel and get a lot of problems that are about gcc
> > extension. But for us it seems that things are not too bad. ;)
>
> Clang accepts bitfields with "unsigned long long", but I've discovered
> something which does _not_ support unsigned long long --- the "sparse"
> tool. :-(
Yes, this problem has been reported by Fengguang. So I am plan to use
another method to define extent_status structure as last time we
discuessed. What do you think?
Thanks,
- Zheng
>
> I discovered this when running "make C=1", i.e.:
>
> rm -f fs/ext4/extents_status.o
> make C=1 fs/ext4/extents_status.o
>
> Here's a simple test case which demo's that sparse doesn't deal well
> with unsigned long long. If we change the last two fields in struct
> extents_status to:
>
> unsigned long es_pblk : 30; /* first physical block */
> unsigned long es_status : 2; /* record the status of extent */
>
> sparse doesn't complain. But as shown below, sparse complains bitterly:
>
> /tmp/foo.c:22:24: warning: invalid access past the end of 'es' (24 28)
>
> I'm not sure Chris will consider this a bug, since bitfields
> with "unsigned long long" isn't standards complaint, even if gcc and
> clang supports it. Chris, what do you think?
>
> - Ted
>
>
> #!/bin/sh
> cat > /tmp/foo.c << EOF
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> struct rb_node {
> unsigned long __rb_parent_color;
> struct rb_node *rb_right;
> struct rb_node *rb_left;
> } __attribute__((aligned(sizeof(long))));
>
> struct extent_status {
> struct rb_node rb_node;
> unsigned long es_lblk; /* first logical block extent covers */
> unsigned long es_len; /* length of extent in block */
> unsigned long long es_pblk : 62; /* first physical block */
> unsigned long long es_status : 2; /* record the status of extent */
> };
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> struct extent_status es;
>
> es.es_status = 3;
>
> printf("%d\n", es.es_status);
> printf("size %u\n", sizeof(es));
> }
> EOF
> sparse /tmp/foo.c
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-03 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-23 12:03 [PATCH 00/10 v3] ext4: extent status tree (step2) Zheng Liu
2013-01-23 12:03 ` [PATCH 01/10 v3] ext4: refine extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-01-23 12:03 ` [PATCH 02/10 v3] ext4: remove EXT4_MAP_FROM_CLUSTER flag Zheng Liu
2013-01-23 12:03 ` [PATCH 03/10 v3] ext4: add physical block and status member into extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-01-29 3:03 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-01-29 5:34 ` Zheng Liu
2013-01-29 17:28 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-01-30 2:43 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-03 3:03 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-03 5:21 ` Zheng Liu [this message]
2013-02-03 8:19 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-02-03 14:57 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-03 7:30 ` Sam Ravnborg
2013-01-23 12:03 ` [PATCH 04/10 v3] ext4: adjust interfaces of " Zheng Liu
2013-01-23 12:03 ` [PATCH 05/10 v3] ext4: track all extent status in " Zheng Liu
2013-01-23 12:03 ` [PATCH 06/10 v3] ext4: lookup block mapping " Zheng Liu
2013-01-23 12:03 ` [PATCH 07/10 v3] ext4: remove single extent cache Zheng Liu
2013-01-23 12:03 ` [PATCH 08/10 v3] fs: allow for fs-specific objects to be pruned as part of pruning inodes Zheng Liu
2013-01-23 12:03 ` [PATCH 09/10 v3] ext4: adjust some functions for reclaiming extents from extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-01-23 12:04 ` [PATCH 10/10 v3] ext4: reclaim " Zheng Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130203052113.GA9823@gmail.com \
--to=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparse@chrisli.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).