From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zheng Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Ext2: remove the overhead check about sb in the function ext2_new_blocks Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:56:46 +0800 Message-ID: <20130206065645.GA32665@gmail.com> References: <5112BB97.8040206@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Jan Kara , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Wang Shilong Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]:36436 "EHLO mail-pa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751719Ab3BFGm0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 01:42:26 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id fb1so608748pad.11 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:42:25 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5112BB97.8040206@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 12:22:47PM -0800, Wang Shilong wrote: > From: Wang Shilong >=20 > It can be guranteed that inode->i_sb should not be null in vfs. > So here the check about it is overhead. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong > --- >=20 > sorry about wrong format patch=EF=BC=8C i will resend it later. Hi Shilong, If you want to re-send a patch series, add [RESEND] in subject, please. Because it could make us know which is the latest one. :-) Regards, - Zheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html