From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>,
Jan kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10 v5] ext4: extent status tree (step2)
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 20:38:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130210013857.GA8526@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360313046-9876-1-git-send-email-wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Hi Zheng,
Thanks for working on this! I've included your v5 extent status tree
patches into the ext4 dev tree. I will start doing further testing.
I suspected it wouldn't make a different, but I tested and confirmed
that your patches don't help fix the regression introduced by the
patch: disable-merging-of-uninitialized-extents
As a result, I've moved the following patches to the unstable portion
of the ext4 patch queue, pending further investigation and discussion:
disable-merging-of-uninitialized-extents
remove-unnecessary-wait-for-extent-coversion-in-ext4_fallocate
ext4_split_extent_should_take_care_of_extent_zeroout
I will be running a full set of tests and looking more deeply at the
patches, but for now I want to get them into linux-next for more
testing and review.
Cheers,
- Ted
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:43:56PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is my fifth try to implement the second step of extent status tree.
> The patch set can be divided into the following parts.
>
> Patch 1/10
> This patch refines the extent status tree
>
> Patch 2/10-6/10
> These patches try to track all extent status in extent status tree and
> make it as a extent cache. In extent_status structure bit field is removed
> because we get some warnings from 'sparse'. Now es_pblk and es_status are
> manipulated by ext4_es_*_pblock and ext4_es_*_status directly. Currently
> when an unwritten extent is allocated, we never know it from map->m_flags
> because ext4_ext_map_blocks doesn't return EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN flag. A
> patch fixes it and we can determine the extent status according to m_flags.
> According to Jan's feedback, we put the hole into extent cache to avoid
> to access extent tree in disk as far as possible. Here if the whole file
> is a hole, this hole will not be cached in extent status tree because it
> is always splitted immediately. Meanwhile the hole will not be cached
> when ext4_da_map_blocks looks up a block mapping because this hole will be
> as a delayed extent later.
>
> Patch 7/10-8/10
> This two patches try to reclaim memory from extent status tree when we
> are under a high memeory pressure.
>
> Patch 9/10-10/10
> Thses patches are picked up again from 1st version because I aware that
> they could remove a bogus wait in ext4_ind_direct_IO when dioread_nolock
> is enabled. After applied them, the latency of dio read can be reduced.
>
> I measure it using fio and the result shows as below.
>
> config file
> -----------
> [global]
> ioengine=psync
> direct=1
> bs=4k
> thread
> group_reporting
> directory=/mnt/sda1/
> filename=testfile
> filesize=10g
> size=10g
> runtime=120
> iodepth=16
>
> [fio]
> rw=randrw
> numjobs=4
>
> result
> ------
> w/ bogus wait
> read : io=1508.1MB, bw=12876KB/s, iops=3218 , runt=120001msec
> clat (usec): min=128 , max=268738 , avg=718.62, stdev=3703.97
> lat (usec): min=128 , max=268739 , avg=718.78, stdev=3703.97
> write: io=1505.2MB, bw=12843KB/s, iops=3210 , runt=120001msec
> clat (usec): min=47 , max=991727 , avg=520.94, stdev=3451.63
> lat (usec): min=47 , max=991727 , avg=521.31, stdev=3451.63
>
> w/o bogus wait
> read : io=1576.4MB, bw=13451KB/s, iops=3362 , runt=120001msec
> clat (usec): min=128 , max=283906 , avg=685.88, stdev=2762.64
> lat (usec): min=128 , max=283907 , avg=686.05, stdev=2762.64
> write: io=1577.9MB, bw=13458KB/s, iops=3364 , runt=120001msec
> clat (usec): min=48 , max=977942 , avg=498.97, stdev=3093.08
> lat (usec): min=48 , max=977943 , avg=499.33, stdev=3093.08
>
> From the result we can see that the avg. of latency could be reduced a little.
>
> changelog:
> v5 <- v4:
> - drop a patch that removes EXT4_MAP_FROM_CLUSTER flag
> (I will revise it in the patch set of get_block_t refinement)
> - fold original patch 3/9 into patch 4/9
> - manipulate es_pblk and es_status directly
> (bit field is removed because it causes some warnings from 'sparse')
> - let ext4_ext_map_blocks return EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN flag
> - rename ext4_es_find_extent with ext4_es_find_delayed_extent
> - add hole status and put hole into extent status tree as a cache
> - convert unwritten extents from extent status tree in ext4_ext_direct_IO
> and end_io callback
> - remove a bogus wait in ext4_ind_direct_IO when dioread_nolock is enabled
>
> v4 <- v3:
> - register a normal shrinker to reclaim extent from extent status tree
>
> v3 <- v2:
> - use prune_super() to reclaim extents from extent status tree
> - stashed es_status into es_pblk
> - remove single extent cache
> - rebase against 3.8-rc4
>
> v2 <- v1:
> - drop patches that try to improve unwritten extent conversion
> - remove EXT4_MAP_FROM_CLUSTER flag
> - add tracepoint for ext4_es_lookup_extent()
> - drop a patch, which tries to fix a warning when bigalloc and delalloc
> are enabled
> - add a shrinker to reclaim memory from extent status tree
> - rebase against 3.8-rc2
>
> v4: http://lwn.net/Articles/536037/
> v3: http://lwn.net/Articles/533730/
> v2: http://lwn.net/Articles/532446/
> v1: http://lwn.net/Articles/531065/
>
> As always, any comments or feedbacks are welcome.
>
> FWIW, when I try to implement patch 3/10, I realize that get_block_t and
> *_map_blocks functions need to be refactored because in ext4 we already
> have six get_block_t functions
> - ext4_get_block
> - ext4_get_block_write
> - ext4_get_block_write_nolock
> - noalloc_get_block_write
> - ext4_da_get_block_prep
> - _ext4_get_block
>
> and four *_map_blocks
> - ext4_map_blocks
> - ext4_da_map_blocks
> - ext4_ext_map_blocks
> - ext4_ind_map_blocks
>
> So I am planning to refine them. First I will try to split ext4_map_blocks
> into two parts, e.g. ext4_map_blocks_read and ext4_map_blocks_write, and
> then try other cleanups and improvmentes.
>
> Thanks,
> - Zheng
>
> Zheng Liu (10):
> ext4: refine extent status tree
> ext4: add physical block and status member into extent status tree
> ext4: let ext4_ext_map_blocks return EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN flag
> ext4: track all extent status in extent status tree
> ext4: lookup block mapping in extent status tree
> ext4: remove single extent cache
> ext4: adjust some functions for reclaiming extents from extent status
> tree
> ext4: reclaim extents from extent status tree
> ext4: convert unwritten extents from extent status tree in end_io
> ext4: remove bogus wait for unwritten extents in ext4_ind_direct_IO
>
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 21 +-
> fs/ext4/ext4_extents.h | 6 -
> fs/ext4/extents.c | 211 ++++--------
> fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 779 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> fs/ext4/extents_status.h | 84 ++++-
> fs/ext4/file.c | 16 +-
> fs/ext4/indirect.c | 5 -
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 148 +++++++--
> fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 3 -
> fs/ext4/page-io.c | 8 +-
> fs/ext4/super.c | 8 +-
> include/trace/events/ext4.h | 207 ++++++++++--
> 12 files changed, 1075 insertions(+), 421 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-10 1:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-08 8:43 [PATCH 00/10 v5] ext4: extent status tree (step2) Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 8:43 ` [PATCH 01/10 v5] ext4: refine extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 15:35 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15 6:38 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 8:43 ` [PATCH 02/10 v5] ext4: add physical block and status member into " Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 15:39 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-08 8:43 ` [PATCH 03/10 v5] ext4: let ext4_ext_map_blocks return EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN flag Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 15:41 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-08 8:44 ` [PATCH 04/10 v5] ext4: track all extent status in extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-02-11 12:21 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15 6:45 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-13 3:28 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-13 3:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: rename ext4_es_find_extent() to ext4_es_find_delayed_extent() Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-13 3:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: track all extent status in extent status tree Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-15 6:53 ` [PATCH 04/10 v5] " Zheng Liu
2013-02-17 16:26 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 8:44 ` [PATCH 05/10 v5] ext4: lookup block mapping " Zheng Liu
2013-02-12 12:31 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15 7:06 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-15 16:47 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15 17:25 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-16 2:32 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-16 16:18 ` Possible TODO projects for the map_blocks() code path (was: Re: [PATCH 05/10 v5] ext4: lookup block mapping in extent status tree) Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-17 3:15 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 8:44 ` [PATCH 06/10 v5] ext4: remove single extent cache Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 8:44 ` [PATCH 07/10 v5] ext4: adjust some functions for reclaiming extents from extent status tree Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 8:44 ` [PATCH 08/10 v5] ext4: reclaim " Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 8:44 ` [PATCH 09/10 v5] ext4: convert unwritten extents from extent status tree in end_io Zheng Liu
2013-02-10 8:45 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-11 1:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-12 12:51 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15 7:12 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-08 8:44 ` [PATCH 10/10 v5] ext4: remove bogus wait for unwritten extents in ext4_ind_direct_IO Zheng Liu
2013-02-12 12:58 ` Jan Kara
2013-02-15 7:14 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-10 1:38 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2013-02-10 8:40 ` [PATCH 00/10 v5] ext4: extent status tree (step2) Zheng Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130210013857.GA8526@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).