From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: no need to remove extent if len is 0 in ext4_es_remove_extent()
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:55:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130222175557.GA21264@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130222062509.GA2735@gmail.com>
This patch didn't apply since it was apparently against an older
version of the extents status patches. Here is the version after I
fixed it up so it would apply into the current ext4 tree. Zheng, can
you do a quick sanity check to make sure I didn't screw up anything?
Thanks!
Eryu, thanks for testing and submitting a bug fix!!
- Ted
>From 7d46e5051453b2c4dfac4e31ae1afb30064cc404 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:54:36 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: no need to remove extent if len is 0 in
ext4_es_remove_extent()
len is 0 means no extent needs to be removed, so return immediately.
Otherwise it could trigger the following BUG_ON() in
ext4_es_remove_extent()
end = lblk + len - 1;
BUG_ON(end < lblk);
This could be reproduced by a simple truncate(1) command by an
unprivileged user
truncate -s $(($((2**32 - 1)) * 4096)) /mnt/ext4/testfile
The same is true for __es_insert_extent().
Patched kernel passed xfstests regression test.
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
---
fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
index 9f1380e..2be245b 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
@@ -392,6 +392,9 @@ static int __es_insert_extent(struct inode *inode, struct extent_status *newes)
struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
struct extent_status *es;
+ if (!len)
+ return 0;
+
while (*p) {
parent = *p;
es = rb_entry(parent, struct extent_status, rb_node);
@@ -456,6 +459,9 @@ int ext4_es_insert_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
es_debug("add [%u/%u) %llu %llx to extent status tree of inode %lu\n",
lblk, len, pblk, status, inode->i_ino);
+ if (!len)
+ return 0;
+
BUG_ON(end < lblk);
newes.es_lblk = lblk;
@@ -649,6 +655,9 @@ int ext4_es_remove_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
es_debug("remove [%u/%u) from extent status tree of inode %lu\n",
lblk, len, inode->i_ino);
+ if (!len)
+ return err;
+
end = lblk + len - 1;
BUG_ON(end < lblk);
--
1.7.12.rc0.22.gcdd159b
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-22 17:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-22 5:34 [PATCH] ext4: no need to remove extent if len is 0 in ext4_es_remove_extent() Eryu Guan
2013-02-22 6:25 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-22 17:55 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2013-02-23 3:40 ` Eryu Guan
2013-02-23 23:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-02-24 5:06 ` Eryu Guan
2013-02-23 4:07 ` Zheng Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130222175557.GA21264@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).