From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
To: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: ext4 xfstests results for 3.8 on Pandaboard ES (ARM)
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:47:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130225024733.GA4477@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130224193552.GA2320@wallace>
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 02:35:52PM -0500, Eric Whitney wrote:
> * Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>:
>
> <snip>
>
> > > BEGIN TEST: Ext4 4k block w/nodelalloc, no flex_bg, and no extents Thu Feb 21
> > > 15:41:27 EST 2013
> > > Ran: 001 002 005 006 007 011 013 014 015 020 053 062 068 069 070 074 075 076
> > > 077 079 083 088 089 091 100 105 112 113 117 120 123 124 125 126 127 128 129
> > > 130 131 132 133 135 141 169 184 192 193 198 204 207 208 209 210 211 212 215
> > > 219 221 224 225 226 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 239 240 245 246 247 248
> > > 249 257 258 263 269 270 271 272 273 275 277 280 285 289 294
> > > Failures: 125 285
> > > END TEST: Ext4 4k block w/nodelalloc, no flex_bg, and no extents Thu Feb 21
> > > 17:24:32 EST 2013
> > >
> > > Xfstest 285 fails reliably for me on both ARM and x86-64 and only in this test
> > > scenario. I see the same failure on 3.7, so it's not a regression (however,
> > > this failure doesn't appear in Ted's early 3.8-rc results).
> > >
> > > --- 285.out 2013-02-19 15:58:25.110665500 -0500
> > > +++ 285.out.bad 2013-02-21 17:23:45.156519882 -0500
> > > @@ -1 +1,3 @@
> > > QA output created by 285
> > > +seek sanity check failed!
> >
> > This test case is used to test seek data/hole feature. After 3.8 ext4
> > has supported it. But it will fail without extents feature because
> > indirect-based file haven't unwritten extent. Please check 285.full
> > file, and you will see that test07 fails.
> >
> > BTW, I am trying to fix this problem for xfstests.
> >
> > Regards,
> > - Zheng
> >
>
> Hi Zheng:
>
> Thanks very much for your explanation and reminder - it is indeed test07 that
> fails. I'm looking forward to testing your fix when it's ready.
Actually I just let xfstest #285 check unwritten extent feature. If the
file system doesn't support it #285 will be skipped. Meanwhile I create
a new test case that only contains test case 1~6. You can find first
version in this link [1].
1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/xfs/msg16231.html
Regards,
- Zheng
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-25 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-23 0:09 ext4 xfstests results for 3.8 on Pandaboard ES (ARM) Eric Whitney
2013-02-23 5:19 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-24 19:35 ` Eric Whitney
2013-02-25 2:47 ` Zheng Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130225024733.GA4477@gmail.com \
--to=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=enwlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).