From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Bryan Mesich <bryan.mesich@ndsu.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fsck.ext4 returning false positives
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:47:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130227214735.GH14253@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130227211622.GF31803@atlantis.cc.ndsu.nodak.edu>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 03:16:22PM -0600, Bryan Mesich wrote:
> I migrated the file system to ext4 in December 2012 by copying the files
> from the old file system to the new one (I didn't go the "upgrade" route).
> I continued performing the weekly file system checks after migrating to
> ext4 and starting seeing strange behavior when running fsck on a snapshot
> volume. Here is the output from this mornings fsck:
>
> e2fsck 1.42.6 (21-Sep-2012)
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> Pass 4: Checking reference counts
> Pass 5: Checking group summary information
> Free blocks count wrong (133413770, counted=133413835).
> Fix? no
>
> Free inodes count wrong (118244509, counted=118244510).
> Fix? no
>
> /dev/sanvg2/bbcontent_snap: 2554723/120799232 files (0.5% non-contiguous),
> 349770870/483184640 blocks
Yes, these "errors" are not important. We've changed e2fsprogs to
suppress these errors when in preen (-p) mode, but in -n or in -y the
messages are printed. That's because it's "good" to update the global
free counts, since some people do assume that the values reported by
dumpe2fs are accurate, but it's not strictly necessary from the
kernel's point of view.
We should probably suppress these errors in -n mode as well.
Regards,
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-27 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-27 21:16 fsck.ext4 returning false positives Bryan Mesich
2013-02-27 21:47 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2013-02-28 15:49 ` Bryan Mesich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130227214735.GH14253@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=bryan.mesich@ndsu.edu \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox