From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, jack@suse.cz,
wenqing.lz@taobao.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ext4: disable merging of uninitialized extents
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 22:26:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130304142602.GA13843@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361808463-25471-2-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 08:07:40PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> Derived from Jan's patch:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/36470
>
> Merging of uninitialized extents creates all sorts of interesting race
> possibilities when writeback / DIO races with fallocate. Thus
> ext4_convert_unwritten_extents_endio() has to deal with a case where
> extent to be converted needs to be split out first. That isn't nice
> for two reasons:
>
> 1) It may need allocation of extent tree block so ENOSPC is possible.
> 2) It complicates end_io handling code
>
> So we disable merging of uninitialized extents which allows us to simplify
> the code. Extents will get merged after they are converted to initialized
> ones.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
After applied this patch, xfstests #275 will print a warning message.
kernel:EXT4-fs (sda2): failed to convert unwritten extents to written
extents -- potential data loss! (inode 13, offset 1537212416, size 524288,
error -28)
But IMHO we don't need to worry about it because it is hard to be
trigger. I hit it because I run xfstests #275 several times. So just a
note here.
Regards,
- Zheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-04 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-25 16:07 [PATCH 1/5] ext4: ext4_split_extent shoult take care about extent zeroout v3 Dmitry Monakhov
2013-02-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] ext4: disable merging of uninitialized extents Dmitry Monakhov
2013-02-25 18:09 ` Jan Kara
2013-03-04 14:26 ` Zheng Liu [this message]
2013-02-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] ext4: add warning to ext4_convert_unwritten_extents_endio Dmitry Monakhov
2013-02-25 18:08 ` Jan Kara
2013-03-04 14:00 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] ext4: remove unnecessary wait for extent conversion in ext4_fallocate() Dmitry Monakhov
2013-02-25 16:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] ext4: invalidate exntent-status-tree during extent_migration Dmitry Monakhov
2013-02-25 16:29 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-02-25 17:04 ` Zheng Liu
2013-02-26 14:23 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix wrong m_len value after unwritten extent conversion (Re: [PATCH 5/5] ext4: invalidate...) Zheng Liu
2013-02-26 15:43 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-02-25 18:06 ` [PATCH 5/5] ext4: invalidate exntent-status-tree during extent_migration Jan Kara
2013-02-25 18:33 ` [PATCH 1/5] ext4: ext4_split_extent shoult take care about extent zeroout v3 Jan Kara
2013-03-04 5:58 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-03-04 6:37 ` Zheng Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130304142602.GA13843@gmail.com \
--to=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).