From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Reserve xattr index for Rich ACL support Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 15:59:51 +0100 Message-ID: <20130307145951.GA19976@quack.suse.cz> References: <1360155211-7146-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jeffm@suse.de, Jan Kara To: Ted Tso Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:39912 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933122Ab3CGO7x (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Mar 2013 09:59:53 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1360155211-7146-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed 06-02-13 13:53:31, Jan Kara wrote: > SUSE is carrying out of tree patches for Rich ACL support for ext4 as > they didn't get upstream due to opposition of some VFS maintainers. > Reserve xattr index for Rich ACLs so that it cannot be taken by anything > else which would force users to backup and reset their Rich ACLs on > files. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Ping? Any opinion on this? Honza > --- > fs/ext4/xattr.h | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.h b/fs/ext4/xattr.h > index 69eda78..7955773 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/xattr.h > +++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.h > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ > #define EXT4_XATTR_INDEX_LUSTRE 5 > #define EXT4_XATTR_INDEX_SECURITY 6 > #define EXT4_XATTR_INDEX_SYSTEM 7 > +#define EXT4_XATTR_INDEX_RICHACL 8 > > struct ext4_xattr_header { > __le32 h_magic; /* magic number for identification */ > -- > 1.7.1 > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR