linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Mixup with name_len & file_type in e2fsprogs
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 19:44:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130308004438.GA29720@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130307182444.GA21237@quack.suse.cz>

On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 07:24:44PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>   I was thinking some more about it. Won't it be cleaner (and not much
> harder) if we always used ext2_dir_entry_2 in e2fsprogs and properly did
> byte swapping of name_len only if FILETYPE feature isn't enabled? I've
> checked and it would mean changing prototypes of like 8 functions in
> ext2fs.h (or better provide new functions with struct ext2_dir_entry_2
> argument) which doesn't seem too bad... This solution seems to be the least
> surprising to the users of libext2fs (esp. if they do some scanning of
> directory blocks themselves or so).

What worries me is potential ABI breackages if we try to redefine
existing interfaces as using ext2_dir_entry_2.  And I'm not convinced
it's worth it to create new versions of the functions that use the new
structure.  This is why I suggested using accessor functions....

	    	    	  	    	  	   - Ted

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-08  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-05 12:18 Mixup with name_len & file_type in e2fsprogs Jan Kara
2013-03-05 18:29 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-03-05 18:41   ` Jan Kara
2013-03-07 18:24     ` Jan Kara
2013-03-07 23:00       ` Andreas Dilger
2013-03-08  0:44       ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2013-03-08  0:46       ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-03-11 14:18         ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130308004438.GA29720@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).