linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ext4 developer's get-together at Collaboration Summit/LSFMM
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 13:53:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130308185354.GA12008@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <513A28A5.8080301@gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 01:06:29PM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> 
> Any chance to move this time slot to the morning or, even better, an
> earlier day in the week?
> 
> We have a track on IO & file systems that this overlaps with on
> Wednesday. Updates from FusionIO on their new, byte addressable
> parts and an open source file system and a panel at the end of the
> day for LSF people who are at both....

I got a request for people to hold it on Wednesday so that people
didn't have to fly out early before LSF, which I'm sure is the same
reason why you're having the track on I/O and filesystems on
Wednesday.  :-)

I did look at the schedule, and I deliberately scheduled things so we
would end before the panel at the end of the day, since I assumed
people would want to listen to that.

As for the rest of the day, I had taken a quick look at the schedule
for Collab Summit, and I didn't see any obvious conflicts; I had
assumed the NVM talk would be another "phase change memory (or some
other resistive memory) that has the random write speed of DRAM, the
random read speeed of Flash, the cost per megabyte of HDD's, and the
with infinite write endurance is coming around the corner, and will
only be two years out so we should start redesigning and rewriting the
kernel and file systems now" --- i.e., the same thing we've been
hearing for the past decade, if not longer.  :-)

But if people need to speak at some of these slots, or are very much
interested in attending we can certainly talk about trying to move
things around to accomodate people's schedule and desire to attend
Collab Summit talks.

What do people think?

					- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-08 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-08 17:24 Ext4 developer's get-together at Collaboration Summit/LSFMM Theodore Ts'o
2013-03-08 18:06 ` Ric Wheeler
2013-03-08 18:53   ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2013-03-08 19:32     ` Ric Wheeler
2013-03-13 12:00 ` Jan Kara
2013-03-13 16:04   ` Eric Sandeen
2013-03-13 16:13     ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-03-13 17:11       ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-03-13 17:21         ` Jan Kara
2013-03-13 17:38         ` Darrick J. Wong
2013-03-14  3:09         ` Tao Ma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130308185354.GA12008@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ricwheeler@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).