linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, wenqing.lz@taobao.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: fix cpu_vs_disk conversions
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:33:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130403123317.GD7741@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364986711-3630-2-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org>

On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:58:31PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
> All new features are broken on bigendian hosts due to lack of conversion:
> es_cache: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/28/64
> inode's csum and ext_to_ind_migrate are also broken.
> 
> Testcase: make C=2 CF="-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>

Thanks for this comprehensive patch.  I'm currently trying to decide
how much of this I should try to push in before the next 3.9-rcX
window, and how much can wait until the next merge window.

We definitely want to fix the fs corruption bug for big-endian
systems.  For the rest, I'm on the fence, since they are less likely
to bite people hard --- metadata checksum is still pretty new and not
fully supported, and the punch hole bug is again also pretty new
functionality.

Also, pushing something to Linus now could potentially disrupt the
patches in the ext4 dev tree for the next merge window.  For the zero
extents problem, there's no question what are priorities should be;
user dataloss trumps developer convenience any day.  For the rest,
what do you all think?  Are they likely to hit people hard enough that
it's worth trying to get this to Linus sooner, as opposed to having
the fixes for the rest of the big endian issues land in 3.10 and
3.9.1?

					- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-03 12:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-03 10:58 [PATCH 1/2] ext4: fix usless declarations Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-03 10:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: fix cpu_vs_disk conversions Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-03 12:33   ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2013-04-03 12:58     ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-03 13:04     ` Zheng Liu
2013-04-03 16:01       ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-03 15:37   ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-03 15:55     ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-04 14:42   ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-10  4:01   ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-10  4:02     ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: fix big-endian bug in extent migration code Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-10  4:02       ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: fix big-endian bug in metadata checksum calculations Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-10  4:02       ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: fix miscellaneous big endian warnings Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-03 12:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: fix usless declarations Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-03 12:31   ` Dmitry Monakhov
2013-04-10  2:50 ` [1/2] " Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130403123317.GD7741@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).