From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: make DR*_RESERVED unsigned long
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 19:27:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130428172731.GA26169@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130428005814.GB10354@somewhere>
On 04/28, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 04:45:37PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > -/* Define reserved bits in DR6 which are always set to 1 */
> > -#define DR6_RESERVED (0xFFFF0FF0)
> > +#define DR6_MASK (0xF00FU) /* Everything else is reserved */
>
> I'm personally fine either with that or with Peter's suggestion to do:
>
> -#define DR6_RESERVED (0xFFFF0FF0)
> +#define DR6_RESERVED (~0xF00FUL)
I missed this suggestion...
Yes, and this allows to kill ifdef too.
> If this should stay stable UAPI,
I do not know, but I guess it would be safer to keep the old define's.
> I really don't mind.
Oh, I do not mind too ;)
OK, please see v3.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: [PATCH v3] x86: make DR*_RESERVED unsigned long
DR6_RESERVED and DR_CONTROL_RESERVED are used to clear the unwanted
bits in the "unsigned long" data, but "ulong &= ~int" also clears the
upper bits that are not specified in mask.
This is actually fine, dr6[32:63] are reserved, but this is not clear
so it would be better to make them "unsigned long" to cleanup the code.
However, depending on sizeof(long), DR6_RESERVED should be either
0xFFFF0FF0 or 0xFFFFFFFF_FFFF0FF0, so this patch redefines them as
(~ 32_bit_mask UL) to avoid ifdef's.
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Suggested-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/debugreg.h | 8 ++------
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/debugreg.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/debugreg.h
index 3c0874d..4ff5d05 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/debugreg.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/debugreg.h
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
are either reserved or not of interest to us. */
/* Define reserved bits in DR6 which are always set to 1 */
-#define DR6_RESERVED (0xFFFF0FF0)
+#define DR6_RESERVED (~0xF00FUL)
#define DR_TRAP0 (0x1) /* db0 */
#define DR_TRAP1 (0x2) /* db1 */
@@ -64,11 +64,7 @@
We can slow the instruction pipeline for instructions coming via the
gdt or the ldt if we want to. I am not sure why this is an advantage */
-#ifdef __i386__
-#define DR_CONTROL_RESERVED (0xFC00) /* Reserved by Intel */
-#else
-#define DR_CONTROL_RESERVED (0xFFFFFFFF0000FC00UL) /* Reserved */
-#endif
+#define DR_CONTROL_RESERVED (~0xFFFF03FFUL) /* Reserved by Intel */
#define DR_LOCAL_SLOWDOWN (0x100) /* Local slow the pipeline */
#define DR_GLOBAL_SLOWDOWN (0x200) /* Global slow the pipeline */
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-28 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CA+55aFwpLu0qNms=hkQr43yqD0K9DgESNm91OEWKT1ZuT8MU6Q@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-23 0:23 ` Unsigned widening casts of binary "not" operations Linus Torvalds
2013-04-23 8:59 ` David Laight
2013-04-23 14:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-23 15:24 ` David Laight
2013-04-23 15:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-23 15:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-23 16:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-23 17:37 ` David Miller
2013-04-23 17:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-23 17:56 ` David Miller
2013-04-23 18:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-04-24 12:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-04-23 0:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-23 13:00 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-04-24 7:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-24 7:47 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-04-25 1:13 ` Lin Ming
2013-04-24 17:07 ` [PATCH] x86: make DR*_RESERVED unsigned long Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-24 18:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-25 14:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-26 16:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-26 16:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-26 17:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-27 14:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-27 16:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-28 0:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-28 17:27 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-04-28 17:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-28 17:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-04-28 17:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-24 22:48 ` [PATCH] " Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-24 23:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-24 23:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-25 1:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130428172731.GA26169@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).