From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH] libext2fs: fix return value Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 22:52:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20130505025256.GA26201@thunk.org> References: <1367643954-31340-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <20130504235503.GC5948@thunk.org> <201305042058.55976.vapier@gentoo.org> <3CC14044-0A69-48EA-90C7-CF173F6A8A42@dilger.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Mike Frysinger , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" To: Andreas Dilger Return-path: Received: from li9-11.members.linode.com ([67.18.176.11]:46373 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751041Ab3EECxG (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 May 2013 22:53:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CC14044-0A69-48EA-90C7-CF173F6A8A42@dilger.ca> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 08:40:21PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > ok, the use of "master" and "next" is weird. i was using the normal "master" > > branch which is apparently out of date. > > I'd have to agree. It would be great if master was merged from maint more often so that patches would apply to either. Sorry, I merge maint into next, but sometimes I forget to bump master up. Fixed now. - Ted