From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, enwlinux@gmail.com,
Jose_Mario_Gallegos@Dell.com, jordan_hargrave@Dell.com,
rwheeler@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] ext4: Try to better reuse recently freed space
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 17:09:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130704150905.GA8520@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372929114-12808-2-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com>
On Thu 04-07-13 11:11:54, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> Currently if the block allocator can not find the goal to allocate we
> would use global goal for stream allocation. However the global goal
> (s_mb_last_group and s_mb_last_start) will move further every time such
> allocation appears and never move backwards.
>
> This causes several problems in certain scenarios:
>
> - the goal will move further and further preventing us from reusing
> space which might have been freed since then. This is ok from the file
> system point of view because we will reuse that space eventually,
> however we're allocating block from slower parts of the spinning disk
> even though it might not be necessary.
> - The above also causes more serious problem for example for thinly
> provisioned storage (sparse images backed storage as well), because
> instead of reusing blocks which are already provisioned we would try
> to use new blocks. This would unnecessarily drain storage free blocks
> pool.
> - This will also cause blocks to be allocated further from the given
> goal than it's necessary. Consider for example truncating, or removing
> and rewriting the file in the loop. This workload will never reuse
> freed blocks until we continually claim and free all the block in the
> file system.
>
> Note that file systems like xfs, ext3, or btrfs does not have this
> problem. This is simply caused by the notion of global pool.
>
> Fix this by changing the global goal to be goal per inode. This will
> allow us to invalidate the goal every time the inode has been truncated,
> or newly created, so in those cases we would try to use the proper more
> specific goal which is based on inode position.
In principle the patch looks fine to me. Just minor style nit below:
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 7 ++++---
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 8 ++++++++
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 20 ++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 6ed348d..4dffa92 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -917,6 +917,10 @@ struct ext4_inode_info {
>
> /* Precomputed uuid+inum+igen checksum for seeding inode checksums */
> __u32 i_csum_seed;
> +
> + /* where last allocation was done - for stream allocation */
> + unsigned long i_last_group;
> + unsigned long i_last_start;
Can we use proper types here please? I think they should be
ext4_grpblk_t and ext4_group_t. And maybe we should define something like
EXT4_INVAL_GRPNO and use that instead of UINT_MAX.
Honza
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -1242,9 +1246,6 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
> unsigned int s_mb_order2_reqs;
> unsigned int s_mb_group_prealloc;
> unsigned int s_max_dir_size_kb;
> - /* where last allocation was done - for stream allocation */
> - unsigned long s_mb_last_group;
> - unsigned long s_mb_last_start;
>
> /* stats for buddy allocator */
> atomic_t s_bal_reqs; /* number of reqs with len > 1 */
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 0188e65..07d0434 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -3702,6 +3702,10 @@ void ext4_truncate(struct inode *inode)
> else
> ext4_ind_truncate(handle, inode);
>
> + /* Invalidate last allocation counters */
> + ei->i_last_group = UINT_MAX;
> + ei->i_last_start = UINT_MAX;
> +
And
> up_write(&ei->i_data_sem);
>
> if (IS_SYNC(inode))
> @@ -4060,6 +4064,10 @@ struct inode *ext4_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
> inode->i_generation = le32_to_cpu(raw_inode->i_generation);
> ei->i_block_group = iloc.block_group;
> ei->i_last_alloc_group = ~0;
> +
> + /* Invalidate last allocation counters */
> + ei->i_last_group = UINT_MAX;
> + ei->i_last_start = UINT_MAX;
> /*
> * NOTE! The in-memory inode i_data array is in little-endian order
> * even on big-endian machines: we do NOT byteswap the block numbers!
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index a9ff5e5..6c23666 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -1591,7 +1591,6 @@ static int mb_mark_used(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, struct ext4_free_extent *ex)
> static void ext4_mb_use_best_found(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> struct ext4_buddy *e4b)
> {
> - struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
> int ret;
>
> BUG_ON(ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group != e4b->bd_group);
> @@ -1622,10 +1621,8 @@ static void ext4_mb_use_best_found(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> get_page(ac->ac_buddy_page);
> /* store last allocated for subsequent stream allocation */
> if (ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_STREAM_ALLOC) {
> - spin_lock(&sbi->s_md_lock);
> - sbi->s_mb_last_group = ac->ac_f_ex.fe_group;
> - sbi->s_mb_last_start = ac->ac_f_ex.fe_start;
> - spin_unlock(&sbi->s_md_lock);
> + EXT4_I(ac->ac_inode)->i_last_group = ac->ac_f_ex.fe_group;
> + EXT4_I(ac->ac_inode)->i_last_start = ac->ac_f_ex.fe_start;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2080,13 +2077,12 @@ ext4_mb_regular_allocator(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> ac->ac_2order = i - 1;
> }
>
> - /* if stream allocation is enabled, use global goal */
> - if (ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_STREAM_ALLOC) {
> - /* TBD: may be hot point */
> - spin_lock(&sbi->s_md_lock);
> - ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group = sbi->s_mb_last_group;
> - ac->ac_g_ex.fe_start = sbi->s_mb_last_start;
> - spin_unlock(&sbi->s_md_lock);
> + /* if stream allocation is enabled and per inode goal is
> + * set, use it */
> + if ((ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_STREAM_ALLOC) &&
> + (EXT4_I(ac->ac_inode)->i_last_start != UINT_MAX)) {
> + ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group = EXT4_I(ac->ac_inode)->i_last_group;
> + ac->ac_g_ex.fe_start = EXT4_I(ac->ac_inode)->i_last_start;
> }
>
> /* Let's just scan groups to find more-less suitable blocks */
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-04 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-04 9:11 [RFC PATCH 0/1] ext4: Try to better reuse recently freed space Lukas Czerner
2013-07-04 9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Lukas Czerner
2013-07-04 15:09 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2013-07-04 15:32 ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-07-04 16:06 ` Jose_Mario_Gallegos
2013-07-08 7:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Lukas Czerner
2013-07-08 8:56 ` Jan Kara
2013-07-08 9:24 ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-07-08 11:59 ` Jan Kara
2013-07-08 21:27 ` Andreas Dilger
2013-07-10 11:30 ` Lukáš Czerner
2013-07-10 11:18 ` Lukáš Czerner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-12-02 16:32 [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Lukáš Czerner
2013-12-04 5:21 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-01 5:30 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-01 11:44 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2014-04-01 14:47 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-04-01 16:35 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2014-04-07 18:22 ` Andreas Dilger
2014-04-07 20:01 ` Andreas Dilger
2014-04-08 1:14 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130704150905.GA8520@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=Jose_Mario_Gallegos@Dell.com \
--cc=enwlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=jordan_hargrave@Dell.com \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).