linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
To: jon ernst <jonernst07@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH] vfs: add missing check for __O_TMPFILE in fcntl_init() (Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix...)
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:13:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130725001319.GA12994@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGW2f1HgtwdekeETXpZvm-KT6Sdw1bUas799yWjQ_jZp3kwaug@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:58:45PM +0000, jon ernst wrote:
> > My purpose is to trigger this bug and fix it.  So I manually define this
> > flag for my convenience.
> >
> >> I saw it has
> >> been defined in header file. (fcntl.h) Did I miss anything?
> >
> > I guess that you might 'include <fcntl.h>' header file, right?  But the
> > O_TMPFILE is defined in $LINUX/include/uapi/asm-generic/fcntl.h.  So
> > maybe compiler couldn't find this header file.
> >
> > Regards,
> >                                                 - Zheng
> --
> Got it. Thank you.  BTW, the weird thing is I didn't see any
> discussion on ext4 mailing list before Al Viro committed this change.
> The first time I heard about this is someone reporting a bug about it.
> Document about this FLAG might be necessary.

Oh, this flag has been discussed in linux-fsdevel mailing list [1].
Maybe you don't subscribe it.

1. https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/3/181

> Also, about this code:
> 
> /* a horrid kludge trying to make sure that this will fail on old kernels */
> #define O_TMPFILE (__O_TMPFILE | O_DIRECTORY)
> 
> why not doing something like this:
> 
> #ifndef O_TMPFILE
> /* a horrid kludge trying to make sure that this will fail on old kernels */
> #define O_TMPFILE (__O_TMPFILE | O_DIRECTORY)
> #endif

Sorry, I don't take a closer look at that thread.  I look at the code,
and it seems that there is no any rule about adding '#ifndef XXX'.
Meanwhile, I notice a comment:

/*
 * When introducing new O_* bits, please check its uniqueness in fcntl_init().
 */

But we are missing adding O_TMPFILE flag in fcntl_init().  So I attach a
patch below.

Al, could you please answer this question?  Thanks.

Regards,
                                                - Zheng

Subject: [PATCH] vfs: add missing check for __O_TMPFILE in fcntl_init()

From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>

As comment in include/uapi/asm-generic/fcntl.h described, when
introducing new O_* bits, we need to check its uniqueness in
fcntl_init().  But __O_TMPFILE bit is missing.  So fix it.

Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
---
*This patch is against ext4/dev tree.*

 fs/fcntl.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fcntl.c b/fs/fcntl.c
index 6599222..65343c3 100644
--- a/fs/fcntl.c
+++ b/fs/fcntl.c
@@ -730,14 +730,14 @@ static int __init fcntl_init(void)
 	 * Exceptions: O_NONBLOCK is a two bit define on parisc; O_NDELAY
 	 * is defined as O_NONBLOCK on some platforms and not on others.
 	 */
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(19 - 1 /* for O_RDONLY being 0 */ != HWEIGHT32(
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(20 - 1 /* for O_RDONLY being 0 */ != HWEIGHT32(
 		O_RDONLY	| O_WRONLY	| O_RDWR	|
 		O_CREAT		| O_EXCL	| O_NOCTTY	|
 		O_TRUNC		| O_APPEND	| /* O_NONBLOCK	| */
 		__O_SYNC	| O_DSYNC	| FASYNC	|
 		O_DIRECT	| O_LARGEFILE	| O_DIRECTORY	|
 		O_NOFOLLOW	| O_NOATIME	| O_CLOEXEC	|
-		__FMODE_EXEC	| O_PATH
+		__FMODE_EXEC	| O_PATH	| __O_TMPFILE
 		));
 
 	fasync_cache = kmem_cache_create("fasync_cache",
-- 
1.7.9.7


  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-25  0:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-17 16:19 kernel BUG at fs/ext4/namei.c:2572! Dave Jones
2013-07-19  1:17 ` Zheng Liu
2013-07-19 12:14 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix a bug when we try to open a file with O_TMPFILE flag Zheng Liu
2013-07-19 19:31   ` Darrick J. Wong
2013-07-19 20:01     ` Dave Jones
2013-07-19 23:36   ` Al Viro
2013-07-20 16:37     ` Zheng Liu
2013-07-21  0:56       ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-07-21  2:45     ` [GIT PULL] " Theodore Ts'o
2013-07-21  3:16       ` Linus Torvalds
2013-07-23  7:51   ` jon ernst
2013-07-23  9:59     ` Zheng Liu
2013-07-23 13:39       ` jon ernst
2013-07-23 23:38         ` Zheng Liu
2013-07-24 21:58           ` jon ernst
2013-07-25  0:13             ` Zheng Liu [this message]
2013-07-25  1:17               ` [PATCH] vfs: add missing check for __O_TMPFILE in fcntl_init() (Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix...) jon ernst
2013-07-29  6:17               ` Zheng Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130725001319.GA12994@gmail.com \
    --to=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonernst07@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).