From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: add WARN_ON to check the length of allocated blocks Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:52:45 -0400 Message-ID: <20130729165245.GJ11816@thunk.org> References: <1373590852-29544-1-git-send-email-wenqing.lz@taobao.com> <20130729150915.GC2615@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Zheng Liu Return-path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:37059 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757002Ab3G2Qwv (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:52:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130729150915.GC2615@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: The patch didn't apply as-is so I had to adjust it a bit. I also reworded the commit description. - Ted >>From 44fb851dfb2f8e3462617e19a7b3b9025db9d919 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zheng Liu Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:51:42 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: add WARN_ON to check the length of allocated blocks In commit 921f266b: ext4: add self-testing infrastructure to do a sanity check, some sanity checks were added in map_blocks to make sure 'retval == map->m_len'. Enable these checks by default and report any assertion failures using ext4_warning() and WARN_ON() since they can help us to figure out some bugs that are otherwise hard to hit. Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index ba33c67..dd32a2e 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -555,14 +555,13 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, int ret; unsigned long long status; -#ifdef ES_AGGRESSIVE_TEST - if (retval != map->m_len) { - printk("ES len assertion failed for inode: %lu " - "retval %d != map->m_len %d " - "in %s (lookup)\n", inode->i_ino, retval, - map->m_len, __func__); + if (unlikely(retval != map->m_len)) { + ext4_warning(inode->i_sb, + "ES len assertion failed for inode " + "%lu: retval %d != map->m_len %d", + inode->i_ino, retval, map->m_len); + WARN_ON(1); } -#endif status = map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ? EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN : EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN; @@ -656,14 +655,13 @@ found: int ret; unsigned long long status; -#ifdef ES_AGGRESSIVE_TEST - if (retval != map->m_len) { - printk("ES len assertion failed for inode: %lu " - "retval %d != map->m_len %d " - "in %s (allocation)\n", inode->i_ino, retval, - map->m_len, __func__); + if (unlikely(retval != map->m_len)) { + ext4_warning(inode->i_sb, + "ES len assertion failed for inode " + "%lu: retval %d != map->m_len %d", + inode->i_ino, retval, map->m_len); + WARN_ON(1); } -#endif /* * If the extent has been zeroed out, we don't need to update @@ -1637,14 +1635,13 @@ add_delayed: int ret; unsigned long long status; -#ifdef ES_AGGRESSIVE_TEST - if (retval != map->m_len) { - printk("ES len assertion failed for inode: %lu " - "retval %d != map->m_len %d " - "in %s (lookup)\n", inode->i_ino, retval, - map->m_len, __func__); + if (unlikely(retval != map->m_len)) { + ext4_warning(inode->i_sb, + "ES len assertion failed for inode " + "%lu: retval %d != map->m_len %d", + inode->i_ino, retval, map->m_len); + WARN_ON(1); } -#endif status = map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ? EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN : EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN; -- 1.7.12.rc0.22.gcdd159b