From: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Fix assertion in ext4_add_complete_io()
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:37:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131015153754.GA28968@wallace> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381843949-31805-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
* Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>:
> It doesn't make sense to require io_end->handle when we are in nojournal
> mode. So update the assertion accordingly to avoid false warnings from
> ext4_add_complete_io().
>
> Reported-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
> fs/ext4/page-io.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/page-io.c b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> index d7d0c7b46ed4..d488f80ee32d 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/page-io.c
> @@ -197,14 +197,15 @@ static void dump_completed_IO(struct inode *inode, struct list_head *head)
> static void ext4_add_complete_io(ext4_io_end_t *io_end)
> {
> struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(io_end->inode);
> + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(io_end->inode->i_sb);
> struct workqueue_struct *wq;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> /* Only reserved conversions from writeback should enter here */
> WARN_ON(!(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN));
> - WARN_ON(!io_end->handle);
> + WARN_ON(!io_end->handle && sbi->s_journal);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
> - wq = EXT4_SB(io_end->inode->i_sb)->rsv_conversion_wq;
> + wq = sbi->rsv_conversion_wq;
> if (list_empty(&ei->i_rsv_conversion_list))
> queue_work(wq, &ei->i_rsv_conversion_work);
> list_add_tail(&io_end->list, &ei->i_rsv_conversion_list);
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
> --
I've successfully tested this patch against 3.12-rc5 - it silences the
warning triggered by ext4/271 in xfstests-bld's dioread_nolock test config.
Thanks very much!
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-15 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-15 13:32 [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Fix assertion in ext4_add_complete_io() Jan Kara
2013-10-15 13:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Fixup kerndoc annotation of mpage_map_and_submit_extent() Jan Kara
2013-10-17 3:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-10-15 15:37 ` Eric Whitney [this message]
2013-10-15 17:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: Fix assertion in ext4_add_complete_io() Lukáš Czerner
2013-10-15 19:54 ` jon ernst
2013-10-16 12:01 ` Jan Kara
2013-10-17 3:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131015153754.GA28968@wallace \
--to=enwlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).