From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
To: Andrei Banu <andrei.banu@redhost.ro>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Weird jbd2 I/O load
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:53:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131021135338.GA3392@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <525DB679.4070008@redhost.ro>
Hi Andrei,
Could you please disable barrier for ext4 and try your 'dd' test again?
$ sudo mount -t ext4 -o remount,barrier=0 ${DEV} ${MNT}
*WARNING: you could lost your data with barrier=0 when you get a power
failure or cold reset.*
We have met a similar problem that is because some SSDs couldn't handle
barrier command properly.
Regards,
- Zheng
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:41:13AM +0300, Andrei Banu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First off let me state that my level of knowledge and expertise is
> in no way a match for that of the people on this list. I am not even
> sure if what I want to ask is in any way related to my problem or
> it's just a side effect (or even plain irrelevant).
>
> I am trying to identify the source of the problems I face with an
> mdraid-1 built with 2 Samsung 840 Pro SSDs. The filesystem is ext-4.
> I face many problems with this array:
>
> - write speeds around 10MB/s and serious server overloads (loads of
> 20 to 100 - this is a quad core CPU) when copying larger files (100+
> MBs):
> root [~]# time dd if=arch.tar.gz of=test4 bs=2M oflag=sync
> 146+1 records in
> 146+1 records out
> 307191761 bytes (307 MB) copied, 23.6788 s, 13.0 MB/s
> real 0m23.680s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.932s
>
> - asymmetrical wear on the 2 SSDs (one SSD has a wear of 6% while
> the other has a wear of 30%):
> root [~]# smartctl --attributes /dev/sda | grep -i wear
> 177 Wear_Leveling_Count 0x0013 094% 094 000 Pre-fail
> Always - 196
> root [~]# smartctl --attributes /dev/sdb | grep -i wear
> 177 Wear_Leveling_Count 0x0013 070% 070 000 Pre-fail
> Always - 1073
>
> - very asymmetrical await, svctm and %util in iostat when copying
> larger files (100+ MB):
> Device: rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s
> wsec/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util
> sda 0.00 1589.50 0.00 54.00 0.00
> 13148.00 243.48 0.60 11.17 0.46 2.50
> sdb 0.00 1627.50 0.00 16.50 0.00
> 9524.00 577.21 144.25 1439.33 60.61 100.00
> md1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
> md2 0.00 0.00 0.00 1602 0.00
> 12816.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
> md0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
>
> - asymmetrical total LBA written but much lower than the above:
> root [~]# smartctl --attributes /dev/sda | grep "Total_LBAs_Written"
> 241 Total_LBAs_Written 0x0032 099 099 000 Old_age
> Always - 23628284668
> root [~]# smartctl --attributes /dev/sdb | grep "Total_LBAs_Written"
> 241 Total_LBAs_Written 0x0032 099 099 000 Old_age
> Always - 25437073579
> (the gap seems to be getting narrower and narrower here though - it
> seems some event in the past caused this)
>
>
> And the number one reason I am trying for help on this list:
> root # iotop -o
> Total DISK READ: 247.78 K/s | Total DISK WRITE: 495.56 K/s
> TID PRIO USER DISK READ DISK WRITE SWAPIN IO> COMMAND
> 534 be/3 root 0.00 B/s 55.06 K/s 0.00 % 99.99 % [jbd2/md2-8]
> ....
>
> When there are problems, jbd2 seems to do 99.9% I/O without doing
> any apparent significant reads or writes. It seems like jbd2 just
> keeps the devices busy.
>
> What could be the reason of some of the above anomalies? Especially
> why is jbd2 keeping the raid members busy while not doing any reads
> or writes? Why the abysmal write speed?
>
> So far I have updated the SSDs firmware, checked the alignment which
> seems ok (1MB boundary), checked with all 3 schedulers, the swap is
> on an md device (so the asymmetrical use and wear again can't be
> explained), I have looked for "hard resetting link" in dmesg but
> found nothing so I guess it's not a cable or back plane issue). What
> else can I check? What else can I try?
>
> Kind regards!
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-21 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-15 21:41 Weird jbd2 I/O load Andrei Banu
2013-10-21 13:53 ` Zheng Liu [this message]
2013-10-21 14:24 ` Andrei Banu
2013-10-21 16:55 ` Zheng Liu
2013-10-21 17:11 ` Zheng Liu
2013-10-21 17:42 ` Andrei Banu
2013-10-22 2:57 ` Zheng Liu
2013-10-22 7:22 ` Andrei Banu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131021135338.GA3392@gmail.com \
--to=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=andrei.banu@redhost.ro \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox