linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Cc: Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com>,
	David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>,
	"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@itwm.fraunhofer.de>,
	Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:39:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131028063905.GA9017@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F81EF3B4-CEBF-43FD-BD38-0AFFF56014C6@dilger.ca>

[Cc Eric Whitney to confirm this problem]

Hi Andreas,

If I remember correctly, this patch might can fix this problem [1].

1. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg39485.html

Regards,
                                                - Zheng

On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:13:26AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> The error reported here is a relatively new one.  It only appeared in
> e2fsck 1.42.8, and wasn’t in the code that I’m using locally (1.42.7)
> so I wasn’t sure what it actually meant without looking at it.
> 
> It looks like some kind of overflow of the extent tree, which causes
> e2fsck to chop off the last 5 disk blocks (40 sectors), though I’m not
> sure exactly why.  From your comments, this can be reproduced with
> your database usage?  Does it use fallocate() or any other strange
> IO operations that might be causing this?
> 
> Have you tried updating your kernel?  If there is repeated corruption
> appearing in the filesystem, then it is either a bug in the kernel or
> in e2fsck.  Not really sure which one to blame at this point.
> 
> Cheers, Andreas
> 
> On Oct 18, 2013, at 9:45 AM, Stephen Elliott <techweb@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> 
> > Any feedback on this guys??? Would really appreciate somebody taking a look over this.
> >  
> > From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com] 
> > Sent: 22 September 2013 20:13
> > To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
> > Subject: Query FSCK Errors on ext4
> >  
> > Hi all,
> >  
> > I have theorised that the problem comes from the MS access DB being open (over Samba) on client workstations when the server is reloaded.
> >  
> > Since ensuring these are closed prior to reloading, I have not seen further FSCK errors on reload. Is there an explanation for this? I can see why this may corrupt DB but not the filesystem.
> >  
> > Just as a primer, I used a ReadyNAS NV+ for many years which was running ext3 and never had this issue. However, since using ext4 on a ReadyNAS Pro, I now see this issue.
> >  
> > Many Thanks
> > Stephen Elliott
> >  
> > From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com] 
> > Sent: 23 July 2013 22:02
> > To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
> > Subject: RE: FSCK Errors on ext4
> >  
> > If it helps guys, the same file as before is causing the issue with inode 4195610, a very large MS access DB.
> >  
> > From: Stephen Elliott [mailto:techweb@ntlworld.com] 
> > Sent: 23 July 2013 21:52
> > To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Andreas Dilger (adilger@dilger.ca); 'Bernd Schubert'
> > Subject: FSCK Errors on ext4
> >  
> > Hi Andreas / Bernd / all,
> >  
> > You may recall advising me on another batch of FSCK errors a few months back.
> >  
> > The same device on an ext4 file system has produced the following errors after a clean reload. It seems to be fine now but wanted your input on this. No bad blocks are reported on the devices etc.
> >  
> > ***** File system check forced at Tue Jul 23 21:02:13 WEST 2013 ***** fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) e2fsck 1.42.8 (20-Jun-2013) Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Inode 4195619, end of extent exceeds allowed value
> >                 (logical block 64907, physical block 11435403, len 16) Clear? yes
> >  
> > Inode 4195619, i_blocks is 1337216, should be 1337176.  Fix? yes
> >  
> > Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> > Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> > Pass 4: Checking reference counts
> > Pass 5: Checking group summary information Block bitmap differences:  -(11435403--11435407) Fix? yes
> >  
> > Free blocks count wrong for group #348 (2130, counted=2135).
> > Fix? yes
> >  
> > Free blocks count wrong (417470107, counted=417470112).
> > Fix? yes
> >  
> >  
> > /dev/c/c: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
> > /dev/c/c: 625785/30212096 files (13.6% non-contiguous), 65923424/483393536 blocks
> >  
> > Many Thanks
> > Stephen Elliott
> 
> 
> Cheers, Andreas
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-28  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <008701cecc19$14734370$3d59ca50$@ntlworld.com>
2013-10-28  6:13 ` Query FSCK Errors on ext4 Andreas Dilger
2013-10-28  6:39   ` Zheng Liu [this message]
2013-10-28  9:00     ` Stephen Elliott
2013-10-28 20:53       ` Andreas Dilger
2013-10-28 21:18         ` Stephen Elliott
2013-11-19 12:44         ` Stephen Elliott
2013-11-19 16:46           ` Andreas Dilger
2013-11-19 17:35             ` Stephen Elliott
2013-11-19 20:27               ` Andreas Dilger
2013-11-19 20:48                 ` Stephen Elliott
     [not found]                   ` <C8263588-E5AD-4C23-81E3-5852DE3B1FC5@dilger.ca>
     [not found]                     ` <002e01cee56f$46f8e3d0$d4eaab70$@ntlworld.com>
2013-11-20 12:35                       ` Bernd Schubert
2013-11-20 12:46                         ` Stephen Elliott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131028063905.GA9017@gmail.com \
    --to=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
    --cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=bernd.schubert@itwm.fraunhofer.de \
    --cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
    --cc=enwlinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=techweb@ntlworld.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).