From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH] check: add support for an external test expunging file Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:34:17 +1000 Message-ID: <20140416003417.GZ15995@dastard> References: <1397530320-20579-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> <20140416001530.GU15995@dastard> <20140416002550.GB12078@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, Ext4 Developers List To: Theodore Ts'o Return-path: Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net ([150.101.137.131]:57327 "EHLO ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750838AbaDPAec (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2014 20:34:32 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140416002550.GB12078@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:25:50PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:15:30AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > If the argument to the -X option is a pathname (that is, includes a > > > '/' character), treat it as the latter case. If it the argument to > > > the -X option is just a bare filename (that is, does not include '/' > > > character), treat it as the former. > > > > Can you add a new option rather than overloading the existing one > > with new meanings and semantics? > > If that's your preference, sure. How does --expunge-list-file strike > you? Or would you prefer something else? I'm easy. :-) -E/--expunge-file is fine by me. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com