From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: fix ZERO_RANGE test failure in data journalling mode Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:37:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20140418143711.GA19131@thunk.org> References: <002a01cf59c3$4eaf7490$ec0e5db0$@samsung.com> <008501cf5a2b$14b6c690$3e2453b0$@samsung.com> <009001cf5a34$c1b68fc0$4523af40$@samsung.com> <001101cf5aa7$49718b50$dc54a1f0$@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: =?utf-8?B?J0x1a8OhxaE=?= Czerner' , 'Jan Kara' , 'linux-ext4' To: Namjae Jeon Return-path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:48201 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753172AbaDROhR (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:37:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001101cf5aa7$49718b50$dc54a1f0$@samsung.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: So a couple of things. First of all, ext4_force_commit() is a very expensive call, so calling it twice is really not a good idea. Secondly, in the ext4_collapse_range() you are calling ext4_force_commit() before filemap_write_and_wait_range(). /* Call ext4_force_commit to flush all data in case of data=journal. */ if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode)) { ret = ext4_force_commit(inode->i_sb); if (ret) return ret; } /* Write out all dirty pages */ ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(inode->i_mapping, offset, -1); if (ret) return ret; Shouldn't we reverse these two calls? Finally, I'm wondering if we would be better off creating a new explicit EXT4_I(inode)->i_write_mutex which is used to block new writes from starting. This could also be used to subsume the ext4_aio_mutex. - Ted