* more resize breakage
@ 2014-05-29 5:22 Eric Sandeen
2014-05-29 5:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2014-05-29 5:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ext4 development
After considering how many resize2fs corruptions we've had, I decided to try to write a resize fuzzer which picks random parameters and sizes, and sees what happens with online & offline grow & offline shrink. When I get it cleaner, I'll send it out to play with.
But it is indeed finding resize issues; for example, with e2fsprogs git master & v3.15-rc3,
# truncate --size=11g fsfile
# mke2fs -t ext4 -O 64bit,^bigalloc,extent,^flex_bg,^meta_bg,resize_inode,sparse_super,^uninit_bg, -E packed_meta_blocks=0 -b 1024 -I 512 -g 3648 fsfile
mke2fs 1.43-WIP (18-May-2014)
Discarding device blocks: done
Creating filesystem with 11534336 1k blocks and 708288 inodes
Filesystem UUID: 25a71d26-0a54-4732-bcb5-d08bdb0878ab
Superblock backups stored on blocks:
3649, 10945, 18241, 25537, 32833, 91201, 98497, 178753, 295489, 456001,
886465, 1251265, 2280001, 2659393, 7978177, 8758849, 11400001
Allocating group tables: done
Writing inode tables: done
Creating journal (32768 blocks): done
Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done
# truncate --size=35g fsfile
# mount -o loop fsfile mnt/
# resize2fs /dev/loop0
resize2fs 1.43-WIP (18-May-2014)
Filesystem at /dev/loop0 is mounted on /mnt/test2/resizefuzzer/mnt; on-line resizing required
old_desc_blocks = 198, new_desc_blocks = 629
The filesystem on /dev/loop0 is now 36700160 blocks long.
# umount mnt
# e2fsck -fn fsfile
e2fsck 1.43-WIP (18-May-2014)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
Block bitmap differences: +54721 +(54723--54732) +54734 +54736 +54741 +(54743--54745) +(54747--54752) +(54755--54764) +54766 +54768 +54773 +(54775--54777) +(54779--54786) +(54788--54796) +54798 +54800 +54805 +(54807--54809) +(54811--54816) +54818 +(54821--54822) +54826 +(54829--54834) -(54838--54840) -54867 -55234 -55239 -(55242--55245) -55247 -(55249--55252) -55254 -55258 -(55265--55266) -55271 -(55274--55277) -55279 -(55281--55284) -55286 -55290 -55299 -55303 -(55306--55309) -55311 -(55313--55316) -55318 -55322 -55329 -(55331--55332) -(55335--55337) -(55339--55340) -(55350--55352) -55379 -55745 -55752 -(55755--55756) -(55758--55759) -(55761--55764) -55766 -55770 -55778 -55784 -(55787--55788) -(55790--55791) -(55793--55796) -55798 -55802 -(55809--55810) -55816 -(55819--55820) -(55822--55
823) -(55825--55828) -55830 -55834 -(55842--55844) -(55847--55849) -(55851--55852) -(55862--55864) -55891 -56257 -(56263--56264) -56266 -(56268--56271) -(56273--56276) -56278 -56282 -56290 !
-(56295--5
6296) -56298 -(56300--56303) -(56305--56308) -56310 -56314 -(56321--56322) -(56327--56328) -56330 -(56332--56335) -(56337--56340) -56342 -56346 -(56354--56356) -(56359--56361) -(56363--56364) -(56374--56376) -56403 -56769 -56777 -56780 -(56784--56788) -56790 -56794 -56802 -56809 -56812 -(56816--56820) -56822 -56826 -(56833--56834) -56841 -56844 -(56848--56852) -56854 -56858 -(56866--56868) -(56871--56873) -(56875--56876) -(56886--56888) -56915 -57281 -57287 -(57289--57291) -57293 -(57296--57300) -57302 -57306 -57314 -57319 -(57321--57323) -57325 -(57328--57332) -57334 -57338 -(57345--57346) -57351 -(57353--57355) -57357 -(57360--57364) -57366 -57370 -(57378--57380) -(57383--57385) -(57387--57388) -(57398--57400) -57427 -57793 -(57800--57801) -57803 -57806 -(57808--57812) -57814 -57818 -578
26 -(57832--57833) -57835 -57838 -(57840--57844) -57846 -57850 -(57857--57858) -(57864--57865) -57867 -57870 -(57872--57876) -57878 -57882 -(57890--57892) -(57895--57897) -(57899--57900) -(!
57910--579
12) -57939 -58305 -(58311--58314) -(58317--58318) -(58320--58324) -58326 -58330 -58338 -(58343--58346) -(58349--58350) -(58352--58356) -58358 -58362
Fix? no
Free blocks count wrong for group #15 (3534, counted=3280).
Fix? no
Free blocks count wrong (35511254, counted=35511000).
Fix? no
fsfile: ********** WARNING: Filesystem still has errors **********
fsfile: 11/2253664 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 1188906/36700160 blocks
Sad face. :(
I haven't looked into these failures, but it seems clear that "we're not there, yet."
Resize seems to be getting so fiendishly complex with all the format options it must cope with.
-Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: more resize breakage
2014-05-29 5:22 more resize breakage Eric Sandeen
@ 2014-05-29 5:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2014-05-29 5:29 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2014-05-29 5:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: ext4 development
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:22:37AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> After considering how many resize2fs corruptions we've had, I decided to try to write a resize fuzzer which picks random parameters and sizes, and sees what happens with online & offline grow & offline shrink. When I get it cleaner, I'll send it out to play with.
>
> But it is indeed finding resize issues; for example, with e2fsprogs git master & v3.15-rc3,
>
> # truncate --size=11g fsfile
> # mke2fs -t ext4 -O 64bit,^bigalloc,extent,^flex_bg,^meta_bg,resize_inode,sparse_super,^uninit_bg, -E packed_meta_blocks=0 -b 1024 -I 512 -g 3648 fsfile
> mke2fs 1.43-WIP (18-May-2014)
> Discarding device blocks: done
> Creating filesystem with 11534336 1k blocks and 708288 inodes
> Filesystem UUID: 25a71d26-0a54-4732-bcb5-d08bdb0878ab
> Superblock backups stored on blocks:
> 3649, 10945, 18241, 25537, 32833, 91201, 98497, 178753, 295489, 456001,
> 886465, 1251265, 2280001, 2659393, 7978177, 8758849, 11400001
>
> Allocating group tables: done
> Writing inode tables: done
> Creating journal (32768 blocks): done
> Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done
>
> # truncate --size=35g fsfile
> # mount -o loop fsfile mnt/
> # resize2fs /dev/loop0
> resize2fs 1.43-WIP (18-May-2014)
> Filesystem at /dev/loop0 is mounted on /mnt/test2/resizefuzzer/mnt; on-line resizing required
> old_desc_blocks = 198, new_desc_blocks = 629
> The filesystem on /dev/loop0 is now 36700160 blocks long.
>
> # umount mnt
> # e2fsck -fn fsfile
> e2fsck 1.43-WIP (18-May-2014)
> Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
> Pass 2: Checking directory structure
> Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
> Pass 4: Checking reference counts
> Pass 5: Checking group summary information
> Block bitmap differences: +54721 +(54723--54732) +54734 +54736 +54741 +(54743--54745) +(54747--54752) +(54755--54764) +54766 +54768 +54773 +(54775--54777) +(54779--54786) +(54788--54796) +54798 +54800 +54805 +(54807--54809) +(54811--54816) +54818 +(54821--54822) +54826 +(54829--54834) -(54838--54840) -54867 -55234 -55239 -(55242--55245) -55247 -(55249--55252) -55254 -55258 -(55265--55266) -55271 -(55274--55277) -55279 -(55281--55284) -55286 -55290 -55299 -55303 -(55306--55309) -55311 -(55313--55316) -55318 -55322 -55329 -(55331--55332) -(55335--55337) -(55339--55340) -(55350--55352) -55379 -55745 -55752 -(55755--55756) -(55758--55759) -(55761--55764) -55766 -55770 -55778 -55784 -(55787--55788) -(55790--55791) -(55793--55796) -55798 -55802 -(55809--55810) -55816 -(55819--55820) -(55822--
55823) -(55825--55828) -55830 -55834 -(55842--55844) -(55847--55849) -(55851--55852) -(55862--55864) -55891 -56257 -(56263--56264) -56266 -(56268--56271) -(56273--56276) -56278 -56282 -56290 !
> -(56295--5
> 6296) -56298 -(56300--56303) -(56305--56308) -56310 -56314 -(56321--56322) -(56327--56328) -56330 -(56332--56335) -(56337--56340) -56342 -56346 -(56354--56356) -(56359--56361) -(56363--56364) -(56374--56376) -56403 -56769 -56777 -56780 -(56784--56788) -56790 -56794 -56802 -56809 -56812 -(56816--56820) -56822 -56826 -(56833--56834) -56841 -56844 -(56848--56852) -56854 -56858 -(56866--56868) -(56871--56873) -(56875--56876) -(56886--56888) -56915 -57281 -57287 -(57289--57291) -57293 -(57296--57300) -57302 -57306 -57314 -57319 -(57321--57323) -57325 -(57328--57332) -57334 -57338 -(57345--57346) -57351 -(57353--57355) -57357 -(57360--57364) -57366 -57370 -(57378--57380) -(57383--57385) -(57387--57388) -(57398--57400) -57427 -57793 -(57800--57801) -57803 -57806 -(57808--57812) -57814 -57818 -5
7826 -(57832--57833) -57835 -57838 -(57840--57844) -57846 -57850 -(57857--57858) -(57864--57865) -57867 -57870 -(57872--57876) -57878 -57882 -(57890--57892) -(57895--57897) -(57899--57900) -(!
> 57910--579
> 12) -57939 -58305 -(58311--58314) -(58317--58318) -(58320--58324) -58326 -58330 -58338 -(58343--58346) -(58349--58350) -(58352--58356) -58358 -58362
> Fix? no
>
> Free blocks count wrong for group #15 (3534, counted=3280).
> Fix? no
>
> Free blocks count wrong (35511254, counted=35511000).
> Fix? no
>
>
> fsfile: ********** WARNING: Filesystem still has errors **********
>
> fsfile: 11/2253664 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 1188906/36700160 blocks
>
> Sad face. :(
D'oh!
/me wonders, is offline grow any better?
Also I "extended" fsfuzz to corrupt only metadata blocks and made the
kernel+e2fsck chew through all that crap. The kernel survived, but e2fsck
seemed to die either failing to allocate blocks to resurrect the journal (bad
bbitmap) or because of that thing where calling block_iterate on an inline data
file makes e2fsck abort.
So, uh, ... long live the patchbomb? :(
--D
>
> I haven't looked into these failures, but it seems clear that "we're not there, yet."
>
> Resize seems to be getting so fiendishly complex with all the format options it must cope with.
>
> -Eric
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: more resize breakage
2014-05-29 5:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2014-05-29 5:29 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-05-29 6:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2014-05-29 5:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Darrick J. Wong; +Cc: ext4 development
On 5/29/14, 12:27 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:22:37AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> After considering how many resize2fs corruptions we've had, I decided to try to write a resize fuzzer which picks random parameters and sizes, and sees what happens with online & offline grow & offline shrink. When I get it cleaner, I'll send it out to play with.
>>
>> But it is indeed finding resize issues; for example, with e2fsprogs git master & v3.15-rc3,
<snip>
>> Sad face. :(
>
> D'oh!
>
> /me wonders, is offline grow any better?
Yes, offline passed.
> Also I "extended" fsfuzz to corrupt only metadata blocks and made the
> kernel+e2fsck chew through all that crap. The kernel survived, but e2fsck
> seemed to die either failing to allocate blocks to resurrect the journal (bad
> bbitmap) or because of that thing where calling block_iterate on an inline data
> file makes e2fsck abort.
>
> So, uh, ... long live the patchbomb? :(
yeah. Maybe I (you?) should try my testcase w/ your latest patchbomb. ;)
-Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: more resize breakage
2014-05-29 5:29 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2014-05-29 6:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2014-05-29 6:09 ` Theodore Ts'o
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2014-05-29 6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: ext4 development
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:29:35AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/29/14, 12:27 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:22:37AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> After considering how many resize2fs corruptions we've had, I decided to try to write a resize fuzzer which picks random parameters and sizes, and sees what happens with online & offline grow & offline shrink. When I get it cleaner, I'll send it out to play with.
> >>
> >> But it is indeed finding resize issues; for example, with e2fsprogs git master & v3.15-rc3,
>
> <snip>
>
> >> Sad face. :(
> >
> > D'oh!
> >
> > /me wonders, is offline grow any better?
>
> Yes, offline passed.
>
> > Also I "extended" fsfuzz to corrupt only metadata blocks and made the
> > kernel+e2fsck chew through all that crap. The kernel survived, but e2fsck
> > seemed to die either failing to allocate blocks to resurrect the journal (bad
> > bbitmap) or because of that thing where calling block_iterate on an inline data
> > file makes e2fsck abort.
> >
> > So, uh, ... long live the patchbomb? :(
>
> yeah. Maybe I (you?) should try my testcase w/ your latest patchbomb. ;)
I think I only have patches out for review for e2fsprogs at the moment. I've
not put my grubby hands on kernel code in a while.
--D
>
> -Eric
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: more resize breakage
2014-05-29 6:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2014-05-29 6:09 ` Theodore Ts'o
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2014-05-29 6:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Darrick J. Wong; +Cc: Eric Sandeen, ext4 development
Darrick,
I don't think the problem which Eric reported in the head of this
thread is fixed by one of your patches, but you did send some patches
which I think would fix some resize bugs, which are setting on the
ext4 "dev" branch for the next merge window.
It's too late for me to deal with this tonight, but I'll run a quick
check and see if Eric's repro fails with the tip of the ext4 patch
queue.
Eric, thanks for creating this tool; I think it will incredibly
helpful in terms of finding and fixing some of these edge cases.
Cheers,
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-29 6:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-29 5:22 more resize breakage Eric Sandeen
2014-05-29 5:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2014-05-29 5:29 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-05-29 6:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2014-05-29 6:09 ` Theodore Ts'o
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).