* [PATCH] ext4: handle symlink properly with inline_data @ 2014-06-02 11:39 Zheng Liu 2014-06-02 14:56 ` Theodore Ts'o 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Zheng Liu @ 2014-06-02 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4 Cc: Ian Nartowicz, Tao Ma, Darrick J. Wong, Andreas Dilger, Theodore Ts'o, Zheng Liu From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> This commit tries to fix a bug that we can't read symlink properly with inline data feature when the length of symlink is greater than 60 bytes but less than extra space. The key issue is in ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink() that it doesn't check whether or not an inode has inline data. When the user creates a new symlink, an inode will be allocated with MAY_INLINE_DATA flag. Then symlink will be stored in ->i_block and extended attribute space. In the mean time, this inode is with inline data flag. After remounting it, ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink() function thinks that this inode is a fast symlink so that the data in ->i_block is copied to the user, and the data in extra space is trimmed. In fact this inode should be as a normal symlink. The following script can hit this bug. #!/bin/bash cd ${MNT} filename=ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789 rm -rf test mkdir test cd test echo "hello" >$filename ln -s $filename symlinkfile cd sudo umount /mnt/sda1 sudo mount -t ext4 /dev/sda1 /mnt/sda1 readlink /mnt/sda1/test/symlinkfile After applying this patch, it will break the assumption in e2fsck because the original implementation doesn't want to support symlink with inline data. Reported-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Reported-by: Ian Nartowicz <claws@nartowicz.co.uk> Cc: Ian Nartowicz <claws@nartowicz.co.uk> Cc: Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma> Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index 55f999a..bc5e4c1 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -148,6 +148,9 @@ static int ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink(struct inode *inode) int ea_blocks = EXT4_I(inode)->i_file_acl ? EXT4_CLUSTER_SIZE(inode->i_sb) >> 9 : 0; + if (ext4_has_inline_data(inode)) + return 0; + return (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) && inode->i_blocks - ea_blocks == 0); } -- 1.7.9.7 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ext4: handle symlink properly with inline_data 2014-06-02 11:39 [PATCH] ext4: handle symlink properly with inline_data Zheng Liu @ 2014-06-02 14:56 ` Theodore Ts'o 2014-06-04 7:11 ` [PATCH] ext4: make ext4_has_inline_data() as a inline function Zheng Liu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2014-06-02 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zheng Liu Cc: linux-ext4, Ian Nartowicz, Tao Ma, Darrick J. Wong, Andreas Dilger, Zheng Liu On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 07:39:28PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> > > This commit tries to fix a bug that we can't read symlink properly with > inline data feature when the length of symlink is greater than 60 bytes > but less than extra space.... Applied, thanks. > + if (ext4_has_inline_data(inode)) > + return 0; > + I am wondering though, as we add ext4_has_inline_data() to more and more codepaths, whether we might be better off making this an inline function in ext4.h. We should see how much such a change bloats the text sizes, and whether there is any measurable CPU difference. Cheers, - Ted ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] ext4: make ext4_has_inline_data() as a inline function 2014-06-02 14:56 ` Theodore Ts'o @ 2014-06-04 7:11 ` Zheng Liu 2014-07-15 14:08 ` Theodore Ts'o 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Zheng Liu @ 2014-06-04 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Theodore Ts'o Cc: linux-ext4, Ian Nartowicz, Tao Ma, Darrick J. Wong, Andreas Dilger, Zheng Liu On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:56:31AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > I am wondering though, as we add ext4_has_inline_data() to more and > more codepaths, whether we might be better off making this an inline > function in ext4.h. We should see how much such a change bloats the > text sizes, and whether there is any measurable CPU difference. Subject: [PATCH] ext4: make ext4_has_inline_data() as a inline function From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> Now ext4_has_inline_data() is used in wide spread codepaths. So we need to make it as a inline function to avoid burning some CPU cycles. text size (bytes): vanilla: 10350562 patched: 10384933 (+0.33%) I use the following script to measure the CPU usage. #!/bin/bash shm_base='/dev/shm' img=${shm_base}/ext4-img mnt=/mnt/loop e2fsprgs_base=$HOME/e2fsprogs mkfs=${e2fsprgs_base}/misc/mke2fs fsck=${e2fsprgs_base}/e2fsck/e2fsck sudo umount $mnt dd if=/dev/zero of=$img bs=4k count=3145728 ${mkfs} -t ext4 -O inline_data -F $img sudo mount -t ext4 -o loop $img $mnt # start testing... testdir="${mnt}/testdir" mkdir $testdir cd $testdir echo "start testing..." for ((cnt=0;cnt<100;cnt++)); do for ((i=0;i<5;i++)); do for ((j=0;j<5;j++)); do for ((k=0;k<5;k++)); do for ((l=0;l<5;l++)); do mkdir -p $i/$j/$k/$l echo "$i-$j-$k-$l" > $i/$j/$k/$l/testfile done done done done ls -R $testdir > /dev/null rm -rf $testdir/* done The result of `perf top -G -U` is as below. vanilla: 13.92% [ext4] [k] ext4_do_update_inode 9.36% [ext4] [k] __ext4_get_inode_loc 4.07% [ext4] [k] ftrace_define_fields_ext4_writepages 3.83% [ext4] [k] __ext4_handle_dirty_metadata 3.42% [ext4] [k] ext4_get_inode_flags 2.71% [ext4] [k] ext4_mark_iloc_dirty 2.46% [ext4] [k] ftrace_define_fields_ext4_direct_IO_enter 2.26% [ext4] [k] ext4_get_inode_loc 2.22% [ext4] [k] ext4_has_inline_data [...] After applied the patch, we don't see ext4_has_inline_data() because it has been inlined and perf couldn't sample it. Although it doesn't mean that the CPU cycles can be saved but at least the overhead of function calls can be eliminated. So IMHO we'd better inline this function. Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com> --- fs/ext4/ext4.h | 7 ++++++- fs/ext4/inline.c | 6 ------ 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h index 0519715..0531df5 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h @@ -2564,7 +2564,6 @@ extern const struct file_operations ext4_file_operations; extern loff_t ext4_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin); /* inline.c */ -extern int ext4_has_inline_data(struct inode *inode); extern int ext4_get_max_inline_size(struct inode *inode); extern int ext4_find_inline_data_nolock(struct inode *inode); extern int ext4_init_inline_data(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, @@ -2630,6 +2629,12 @@ extern void ext4_inline_data_truncate(struct inode *inode, int *has_inline); extern int ext4_convert_inline_data(struct inode *inode); +static inline int ext4_has_inline_data(struct inode *inode) +{ + return ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_INLINE_DATA) && + EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_off; +} + /* namei.c */ extern const struct inode_operations ext4_dir_inode_operations; extern const struct inode_operations ext4_special_inode_operations; diff --git a/fs/ext4/inline.c b/fs/ext4/inline.c index 645205d..141b6ac 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inline.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inline.c @@ -120,12 +120,6 @@ int ext4_get_max_inline_size(struct inode *inode) return max_inline_size + EXT4_MIN_INLINE_DATA_SIZE; } -int ext4_has_inline_data(struct inode *inode) -{ - return ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_INLINE_DATA) && - EXT4_I(inode)->i_inline_off; -} ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ext4: make ext4_has_inline_data() as a inline function 2014-06-04 7:11 ` [PATCH] ext4: make ext4_has_inline_data() as a inline function Zheng Liu @ 2014-07-15 14:08 ` Theodore Ts'o 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2014-07-15 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-ext4, Ian Nartowicz, Tao Ma, Darrick J. Wong, Andreas Dilger, Zheng Liu On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 03:11:11PM +0800, Zheng Liu wrote: > Now ext4_has_inline_data() is used in wide spread codepaths. So we need > to make it as a inline function to avoid burning some CPU cycles. > > text size (bytes): > vanilla: 10350562 > patched: 10384933 (+0.33%) This represents a difference of 34k, which was over 10% the text size of ext4.o --- so this surprised me greatly. I just did my own testing, and difference I see is 117 bytes: text data bss dec hex filename before: 326110 19258 5528 350896 55ab0 fs/ext4/ext4.o after: 326227 19258 5528 351013 55b25 fs/ext4/ext4.o So I'm going to adjust the patch include these numbers, which are much less likely to cause embedded people to complain about a large increase in code bloat. :-) Thanks, applied. - Ted ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-15 14:09 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-06-02 11:39 [PATCH] ext4: handle symlink properly with inline_data Zheng Liu 2014-06-02 14:56 ` Theodore Ts'o 2014-06-04 7:11 ` [PATCH] ext4: make ext4_has_inline_data() as a inline function Zheng Liu 2014-07-15 14:08 ` Theodore Ts'o
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).