From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mke2fs: handle flex_bg collision with backup descriptors
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 22:11:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140706021124.GE19036@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393618545-29319-1-git-send-email-adilger@dilger.ca>
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 01:15:45PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> If a large flex_bg factor is specified and the block allocator was
> laying out block or inode bitmaps or inode tables, and collides with
> previously allocated metadata (for example the backup superblock or
> group descriptors) it would reset the allocator back to the beginning
> of the flex_bg instead of continuing past the obstruction.
>
> For example, with "-G 131072" the inode table will hit the backup
> descriptors in groups 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and start interleaving with the
> block and inode bitmaps. That results in poorly allocated bitmaps
> and inode tables that are interleaved and not contiguous as was
> intended for flex_bg:
>
> Group 0: (Blocks 0-32767)
> Primary superblock at 0, Group descriptors at 1-2048
> Block bitmap 2049 (+2049), Inode bitmap at 133121 (bg #4+2049)
> Inode table 264193-264200 (bg #8+2049)
> :
> :
> Group 3838: (Blocks 125763584-125796351) [INODE_UNINIT, BLOCK_UNINIT]
> Block bitmap 5887 (bg #0+5887), Inode bitmap 136959 (bg #4+5887)
> Inode table 294897-294904 (bg #8 + 32753)
> Group 3839: (Blocks 125796352-125829119) [INODE_UNINIT, BLOCK_UNINIT]
> Block bitmap 5888 (bg #0+5888), Inode bitmap 136960 (bg #4+5888)
> Inode table 5889-5896 (bg #0 + 5889)
> Group 3840: (Blocks 125829120-125861887) [INODE_UNINIT, BLOCK_UNINIT]
> Block bitmap 5897 (bg #0+5897), Inode bitmap 136961 (bg #4+5889)
> Inode table 5898-5905 (bg #0 + 5898)
> :
> :
>
> Instead, skip the intervening blocks if there aren't too many of them.
> That mostly keeps the flex_bg allocations from colliding, though still
> not perfect because there is still some overlap with the backups.
> This patch addresses the majority of the problem, allowing about 124k
> groups to be layed out perfectly, instead of less than 4k groups with
> the previous code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Thanks, applied.
- Ted
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-06 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-28 20:15 [PATCH] mke2fs: handle flex_bg collision with backup descriptors Andreas Dilger
2014-07-06 2:11 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140706021124.GE19036@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).