linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ext4: first write to large ext3 filesystem takes 96 seconds
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 20:16:55 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140708001655.GI8254@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140707211349.GA12478@kvack.org>

On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 05:13:49PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:s
> Hi folks,
> 
> I've just ran into a bug with the ext4 codebase in 3.4.91 that doesn't seem 
> to exist in ext3, and was wondering if anyone has encountered this before.  
> I have a 7.4TB ext3 filesystem that has been filled with 1.8TB of data.  
> When this filesystem is freshly mounted, the first write to the filesystem 
> takes a whopping 96 seconds to complete, during which time the system is 
> reading about 1000 blocks per second.  Subsequent writes are much quicker.  
> The problem seems to be that ext4 is loading all of the bitmaps on the 
> filesystem before the first write proceeds.  The backtrace looks roughly as 
> follows:

So the issue is that ext3 will just allocate the first free block it
can find, even if it is a single free block in block group #1001,
followed by a single free block in block group #2002.  Ext4 tries a
harder to find contiguous blocks.

If you are using an ext3 file system format, the block allocation
bitmaps are scattered across the entire file system, so we end up
doing a lot random 4k seeks.

We can try to be a bit smarter about how we try to search the file
system for free blocks.

Out of curiosity, can you send me a copy of the contents of:

/proc/fs/ext4/dm-XX/mb_groups

Thanks!!

					- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-08  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-07 21:13 ext4: first write to large ext3 filesystem takes 96 seconds Benjamin LaHaise
2014-07-08  0:16 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2014-07-08  1:35   ` Benjamin LaHaise
2014-07-08  3:54     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-07-08 14:53       ` Benjamin LaHaise
2014-07-08  5:11   ` Andreas Dilger
2014-07-30 14:49     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2014-07-31 13:03       ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-07-31 14:04         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2014-07-31 15:27           ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140708001655.GI8254@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).