From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: Add support IOC_MOV_DATA ioctl Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 05:15:00 -0700 Message-ID: <20140708121500.GA518@infradead.org> References: <003f01cf9aa4$1e9e5240$5bdaf6c0$@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Dave Chinner , Theodore Ts'o , linux-ext4 , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Luk?? Czerner , Brian Foster , Christoph Hellwig , Ashish Sangwan , xfs@oss.sgi.com To: Namjae Jeon Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:35148 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753801AbaGHMPE (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2014 08:15:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <003f01cf9aa4$1e9e5240$5bdaf6c0$@samsung.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 08:59:49PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote: > This patch implements fs ioctl's IOC_MOV_DATA for XFS. Shouldn't this share code with the XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT implementation?