From: Azat Khuzhin <a3at.mail@gmail.com>
To: Brad Campbell <brad@fnarfbargle.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Online resize issue with 3.13.5 & 3.15.6
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:04:03 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140726070403.GA24045@azat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53D32A9B.50903@fnarfbargle.com>
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 12:12:11PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
> On 26/07/14 11:31, Brad Campbell wrote:
> >On 25/07/14 22:07, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> >>On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 07:44:07PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
> >>>
> >>>Appreciate you taking a look at this and I see where you are going
> >>>with it.
> >>
> >>This patch looks good to me. If you could give it a try, I would
> >>appreciate it.
> >>
> >>This looks like the same bug which was reported in Ubuntu:
> >>
> >>https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/1321958
> >
> >
> >The patch would not apply automatically to 1.42.11 but was easy enough
> >to apply by hand.
> >
> >root@srv:~/src/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs-1.42.11/resize# ./resize2fs -d 255
> >/dev/md0
> >resize2fs 1.42.11 (09-Jul-2014)
> >fs has 4007207 inodes, 1957 groups required.
> >fs requires 4374122900 data blocks.
> >With 1957 group(s), we have 63820826 blocks available.
> >Added 131540 extra group(s), blks_needed 4374122900, data_blocks
> >4356990326, last_start 4356599580
> >Added 523 extra group(s), blks_needed 4374122900, data_blocks
> >4374059350, last_start 4373440788
> >Added 2 extra group(s), blks_needed 4374122900, data_blocks 4374124886,
> >last_start 4373473426
> >Last group's overhead is 1430
> >Need 649474 data blocks in last group
> >Final size of last group is 650904
> >Estimated blocks needed: 4391437088
> >Extents safety margin: 2826959
> >Filesystem at /dev/md0 is mounted on /server; on-line resizing required
> >old_desc_blocks = 2768, new_desc_blocks = 2795
> >./resize2fs: Invalid argument While checking for on-line resizing support
> >
> >[489412.650430] EXT4-fs (md0): resizing filesystem from 5804916736 to
> >5860149888 blocks
> >[489412.700282] EXT4-fs warning (device md0): verify_reserved_gdb:713:
> >reserved GDT 2769 missing grp 177147 (5804755665)
> >[489412.739676] EXT4-fs (md0): resized filesystem to 5860149888
> >[489413.215230] EXT4-fs warning (device md0): ext4_group_extend:1720:
> >can't shrink FS - resize aborted
Online resizing needs support in kernel, so it is not strange that it
doesn't fixed with this patch.
I will take a look into online resizing code, but don't promise
anything.
>
> Rebooted, did an fsck -f (was clean) and ran it again without the fs
> mounted.
>
> root@srv:~/src/e2fsprogs/e2fsprogs-1.42.11/resize# ./resize2fs -d 255
> /dev/md0
> resize2fs 1.42.11 (09-Jul-2014)
> fs has 4007359 inodes, 1957 groups required.
> fs requires 4655464570 data blocks.
> With 1957 group(s), we have 63820826 blocks available.
> Added 140126 extra group(s), blks_needed 4655464570, data_blocks 4637219414,
> last_start 4636829448
> Added 557 extra group(s), blks_needed 4655464570, data_blocks 4655398390,
> last_start 4654584520
> Added 3 extra group(s), blks_needed 4655464570, data_blocks 4655496694,
> last_start 4654617158
> Last group's overhead is 1820
> Need 847412 data blocks in last group
> Final size of last group is 849232
> Estimated blocks needed: 4674027936
> Extents safety margin: 2261777
> Resizing the filesystem on /dev/md0 to 5860149888 (4k) blocks.
> read_bitmaps: Memory used: 132k/763980k (49k/84k), time: 113.93/ 1.26/ 4.45
> read_bitmaps: I/O read: 648MB, write: 0MB, rate: 5.69MB/s
> fix_uninit_block_bitmaps 1: Memory used: 132k/763980k (49k/84k), time: 7.61/
> 7.91/ 0.00
> adjust_superblock: Memory used: 132k/18014398507538268k (52k/81k), time:
> 0.49/ 0.57/ 0.00
> fix_uninit_block_bitmaps 2: Memory used: 132k/18014398507538268k (52k/81k),
> time: 8.10/ 8.17/ 0.00
> blocks_to_move: Memory used: 132k/18014398508253624k (52k/81k), time: 0.74/
> 0.50/ 0.05
> Number of free blocks: 1126335202/7242495991050, Needed: 0
> block_mover: Memory used: 132k/18014398508254140k (57k/76k), time:
> 192.51/192.28/ 0.00
> block_mover: I/O read: 1MB, write: 0MB, rate: 0.01MB/s
> inode_scan_and_fix: Memory used: 132k/18014398508254140k (57k/76k), time:
> 0.00/ 0.00/ 0.00
> inode_ref_fix: Memory used: 132k/18014398508254140k (57k/76k), time: 0.00/
> 0.00/ 0.00
> move_itables: Memory used: 132k/18014398508254140k (57k/76k), time: 0.01/
> 0.00/ 0.00
> calculate_summary_stats: Memory used: 132k/18014398508254140k (57k/76k),
> time: 168.74/168.43/ 0.01
> fix_resize_inode: Memory used: 132k/18014398508254140k (61k/72k), time:
> 0.00/ 0.00/ 0.00
> fix_resize_inode: I/O read: 0MB, write: 3MB, rate: 1843.88MB/s
> fix_sb_journal_backup: Memory used: 132k/18014398508254140k (61k/72k), time:
> 0.00/ 0.00/ 0.00
> overall resize2fs: Memory used: 132k/18014398508254140k (61k/72k), time:
> 492.61/379.13/ 4.52
> overall resize2fs: I/O read: 648MB, write: 13MB, rate: 1.34MB/s
> The filesystem on /dev/md0 is now 5860149888 blocks long.
>
> So it would appear to have succeeded when run offline.
Brad, many thanks for testing, I will resend patch later.
(with your tested-by if you don't mind)
Thanks.
Azat.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-26 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-20 11:26 Online resize issue with 3.13.5 & 3.15.6 Brad Campbell
2014-07-21 1:03 ` Brad Campbell
2014-07-25 4:33 ` Brad Campbell
2014-07-25 8:13 ` Azat Khuzhin
2014-07-25 11:44 ` Brad Campbell
2014-07-25 14:07 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-07-26 3:31 ` Brad Campbell
2014-07-26 4:12 ` Brad Campbell
2014-07-26 7:04 ` Azat Khuzhin [this message]
2014-07-26 7:45 ` Azat Khuzhin
2014-07-26 12:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-07-26 12:57 ` Azat Khuzhin
2014-07-26 13:46 ` Brad Campbell
2014-07-26 13:56 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-07-29 2:46 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-07-29 8:00 ` Brad Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140726070403.GA24045@azat \
--to=a3at.mail@gmail.com \
--cc=brad@fnarfbargle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).