From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] e2fsck: don't offer to fix the checksum of fixed extents Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 19:52:30 -0400 Message-ID: <20140727235230.GE6725@thunk.org> References: <20140726003339.28334.54447.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20140726003531.28334.40019.stgit@birch.djwong.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: "Darrick J. Wong" Return-path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:59622 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752207AbaG0Xwc (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2014 19:52:32 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140726003531.28334.40019.stgit@birch.djwong.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 05:35:31PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > If an extent fails checksum and the sanity checks, and the user elects > to fix the extents, don't bother asking (the second time) if the user > would like to fix the checksum. Refactor some redundant code to make > what's going on a little cleaner. > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong Applied, thanks. - Ted