Re: Question: errors=continue behaviour for failed external journal device

Theodore Ts'o
2014-07-28T15:00:30Z

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 09:31:05AM -0400, Vlad Dobrotescu wrote:
> If you are talking about changes, wouldn't "read-only" be a better fall-back
> alternative for a failed or missing external journal?

For a missing external journal, we simply wouldn't allow the mount to
succeed at all.

The discussion here was about what to do if we detect some kind of
inconsistency in a mounted file system.

Cheers,

- Ted