linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] ext4: track extent status tree shrinker delay statictics
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 20:10:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140904121048.GA13193@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140827132607.GA22211@quack.suse.cz>

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:26:07PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 07-08-14 11:35:49, Zheng Liu wrote:
> > From: Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
> > 
> > This commit adds some statictics in extent status tree shrinker.  The
> > purpose to add these is that we want to collect more details when we
> > encounter a stall caused by extent status tree shrinker.  Here we count
> > the following statictics:
> >   stats:
> >     the number of all objects on all extent status trees
> >     the number of reclaimable objects on lru list
> >     cache hits/misses
> >     the last sorted interval
> >     the number of inodes on lru list
> >   average:
> >     scan time for shrinking some objects
> >     the number of shrunk objects
> >   maximum:
> >     the inode that has max nr. of objects on lru list
> >     the maximum scan time for shrinking some objects
> > 
> > The output looks like below:
> >   $ cat /proc/fs/ext4/sda1/es_shrinker_info
> >   stats:
> >     28228 objects
> >     6341 reclaimable objects
> >     5281/631 cache hits/misses
> >     586 ms last sorted interval
> >     250 inodes on lru list
> >   average:
> >     153 us scan time
> >     128 shrunk objects
> >   maximum:
> >     255 inode (255 objects, 198 reclaimable)
> >     125723 us max scan time
>   When reading through this again, I realized that we probably don't want
> this file in /proc/fs/ext4 but rather in /sys/kernel/debug/ext4 because
> it's really a debugging interface and we don't want any tools to start
> using it.

Fair enough.  I will fix it in next version.

Thanks,
                                                - Zheng

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-04 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-07  3:35 [PATCH v3 0/6] ext4: extents status tree shrinker improvement Zheng Liu
2014-08-07  3:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] ext4: improve extents status tree trace point Zheng Liu
2014-09-02  2:25   ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-08-07  3:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] ext4: track extent status tree shrinker delay statictics Zheng Liu
2014-08-27 13:26   ` Jan Kara
2014-09-04 12:10     ` Zheng Liu [this message]
2014-09-04 15:49       ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-08-07  3:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] ext4: cache extent hole in extent status tree for ext4_da_map_blocks() Zheng Liu
2014-08-27 13:55   ` Jan Kara
2014-09-04 13:05     ` Zheng Liu
2014-09-02  2:43   ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-09-04 13:04     ` Zheng Liu
2014-09-04 15:54       ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-08-07  3:35 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] ext4: change lru to round-robin in extent status tree shrinker Zheng Liu
2014-08-27 15:01   ` Jan Kara
2014-09-03  3:37     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-09-03 15:31       ` Jan Kara
2014-09-03 20:00         ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-09-03 22:14           ` Jan Kara
2014-09-03 22:38             ` Theodore Ts'o
     [not found]               ` <20140904071553.GA26930@quack.suse.cz>
2014-09-04 15:44                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-09-08 15:47                   ` Jan Kara
2014-08-07  3:35 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ext4: use a list to track all reclaimable objects for extent status tree Zheng Liu
2014-08-27 15:13   ` Jan Kara
2014-09-03  3:44     ` Theodore Ts'o
2014-08-07  3:35 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] ext4: use a garbage collection algorithm to manage object Zheng Liu
2014-08-27 15:24   ` Jan Kara
2014-10-20 14:48 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] ext4: extents status tree shrinker improvement Theodore Ts'o
2014-10-21 10:22   ` Jan Kara
2014-10-21 15:58     ` 刘峥(文卿)
2014-11-03 16:10       ` Jan Kara
2014-11-07  2:38         ` Zheng Liu
2014-11-13 23:40         ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140904121048.GA13193@gmail.com \
    --to=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=wenqing.lz@taobao.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).