From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Li Xi <pkuelelixi@gmail.com>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix deadlock of i_data_sem in ext4_mark_inode_dirty()
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 23:30:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140905033054.GE1971@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPTn0cBcy+hHeC0oUk8eVrqHUTF8N05puKmZPBOKrafvaQHhxA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:29:16AM +0800, Li Xi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 04:49:58PM +0800, Li Xi wrote:
> >> There are multiple places where ext4_mark_inode_dirty() is called holding
> >> write lock of EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem. However, if
> >> ext4_mark_inode_dirty() needs to expand inode size, this will cause
> >> deadlock when ext4_xattr_block_set() tries to get read lock of
> >> EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem.
> >
> > This was with inline data enabled, right?
> I hit this problem when starting a kernel with project quota support for ext4.
> The ext4 file system was not formated with project quota feature so it tried
> to extend the space for project ID. And this problem happened every time
> when the kernel was rebooted. Inline data was not enable on that file
> system. I am not sure whether this problem will happen under other
> circumstances. :)
I'm not understanding why expanding the inode size would result in
needing to call ext4_xattr_block_set. Was that becuse you were
storing the project quota in the xattr? I'm just trying to understand
the context.
Please also note that a recent set of patches (sent to the ext4 list
and in the ext4 git tree) has removed the need for taking i_data_sem
in xattr.c:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/385347
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/385348
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/385346
(It's the 2/3 patch that removes taking i_data_sem read lock in xattr.c.)
Regards,
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-05 3:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAPTn0cAPYMMDx-_RvL22Mf8YMcGib65YbiwfzDhCkEO7-OtHjw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-09-05 1:59 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix deadlock of i_data_sem in ext4_mark_inode_dirty() Theodore Ts'o
2014-09-05 2:29 ` Li Xi
2014-09-05 3:30 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2014-09-05 4:44 ` Li Xi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140905033054.GE1971@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pkuelelixi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox