linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@kernel.org>,
	jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.de>, Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
	reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	cluster-devel@redhat.com, Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] quota: Allow each filesystem to specify which quota types it supports
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:51:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141022165150.GA12809@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141022162915.GB18443@lst.de>

On Wed 22-10-14 18:29:15, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 04:38:26PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Currently all filesystems supporting VFS quota support user and group
> > quotas. With introduction of project quotas this is going to change so
> > make sure filesystem isn't called for quota type it doesn't support by
> > introduction of a bitmask determining which quota types each filesystem
> > supports.
> 
> Why don't you keep this bitmask in the dquot.c instead of pushing it
> to the caller?  So far usage of s_dquot is mostly confined to dquot.c
> (with a few leaks to the filesystems using it), so keeping it that
> way seems like a good idea.
  So there are two reasons:
1) Currently if you call quotactl() with invalid quota type you'll get
EINVAL. To maintain this with addition of project quotas you need to check
the types early before calling check_quotactl_permission() and other
checks.

2) I didn't want filesystem quotactl callbacks to deal with quota types
they don't support. Sure each fs could do a type check in the callback but
this looked easier.

Now I see your point about s_dquot and I can move allowed_types out of
s_dquot if that makes you happier. But otherwise what I did still seems as
the best solution to me.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-22 16:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-21 14:38 [PATCH 0/12 v3] Moving i_dquot out of struct inode Jan Kara
2014-10-21 14:38 ` [PATCH 01/12] quota: Remove const from function declarations Jan Kara
2014-10-21 14:38 ` [PATCH 02/12] quota: Allow each filesystem to specify which quota types it supports Jan Kara
2014-10-22 16:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-22 16:51     ` Jan Kara [this message]
2014-10-23  8:53       ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-10-21 14:38 ` [PATCH 03/12] gfs2: Set allowed quota types Jan Kara
2014-10-21 14:38 ` [PATCH 04/12] xfs: " Jan Kara
2014-10-21 14:38 ` [PATCH 05/12] quota: Use function to provide i_dquot pointers Jan Kara
2014-10-21 14:38 ` [PATCH 06/12] ext2: Convert to private i_dquot field Jan Kara
2014-10-21 14:38 ` [PATCH 07/12] ext3: " Jan Kara
2014-10-21 14:38 ` [PATCH 08/12] ext4: " Jan Kara
2014-10-21 14:38 ` [PATCH 09/12] ocfs2: " Jan Kara
2014-10-23 10:25   ` Joel Becker
2014-10-23 12:05     ` Jan Kara
2014-10-21 14:38 ` [PATCH 10/12] reiserfs: " Jan Kara
2014-10-21 14:38 ` [PATCH 11/12] jfs: " Jan Kara
2014-10-21 14:38 ` [PATCH 12/12] vfs: Remove i_dquot field from inode Jan Kara
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-11-04 11:19 [PATCH 0/12 v4] Moving i_dquot out of struct inode Jan Kara
2014-11-04 11:19 ` [PATCH 02/12] quota: Allow each filesystem to specify which quota types it supports Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141022165150.GA12809@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jeffm@suse.de \
    --cc=jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaggy@kernel.org \
    --cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).